[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-crl-numbers-04
Nancy Cam-Winget via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 03 April 2025 00:12 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.8.216] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8EA16AA3F9; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 17:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Nancy Cam-Winget via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.37.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <174363912443.2698532.6435437140055099948@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 17:12:04 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: QTWRXAFOAJJBDQI6VYQLKCQTCAGGYKAK
X-Message-ID-Hash: QTWRXAFOAJJBDQI6VYQLKCQTCAGGYKAK
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-crl-numbers.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-crl-numbers-04
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/jCKPMCWIfNpaIPEHt7jakKxNPvw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>
Reviewer: Nancy Cam-Winget Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document updates RFC6487 to account for the handling of CRL ordering rules when used in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure. The document reads well and I have found no issues to the requested updates.
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-si… Nancy Cam-Winget via Datatracker