[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04

Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 10 February 2021 12:44 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: calsify@ietf.org, draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161296108746.13523.4234835837695144328@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:44:47 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/jWTUEi-j-Tpmh8utWxXHqMvXKtw>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04

Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The draft defines a set of extensions to the VALARM component of iCalendar.
The document is short and well written, its Security Considerations and Privacy Considerations
sections are sensible. I found the document ready.

Nit: I would recommend adding a sentence to the Security Considerations section saying that 
these VALARM extensions inherited security properties of iCalendar [RFC5545].

[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ca… Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Ken Murchison
Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Ken Murchison
Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Valery Smyslov