Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr-08

[Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]>]

Hi Carl,
  Thanks for your review. I will add the reference to RFC4832 like you
stated. Is there a specific reason why you prefer the security related
text be moved to the body of the document instead of the Security
Considerations section?

Regards
Suresh

On 02/28/2012 08:00 AM, Carl Wallace wrote:
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
> just like any other last call comments.
> 
> 
> This document proposes initiation, utilization and termination mechanisms
> for localized routing between mobile access gateways within a proxy mobile
> IPv6 domain.  The security considerations section introduces (for this
> document) the requirement for IPSec and the reuse of a security
> association described in RFC 5213.  This text belongs in the body of the
> document in my opinion, with the security considerations possibly changed
> to simply reference RFC 4832 and RFC 5213 security considerations.
> 	
> 
>