Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr-08
Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Thu, 01 March 2012 04:18 UTC
Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E22321F854D; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:18:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.397, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kwhm9jpUgf29; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B040221F8547; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q214IYvi020611 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:18:35 -0600
Received: from [164.48.125.51] (147.117.20.214) by smtps-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.20.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:18:33 -0500
Message-ID: <4F4EF893.1060201@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:18:27 -0500
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
References: <CB723A03.1400E%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <CB723A03.1400E%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 04:18:52 -0000
Hi Carl, Thanks for your review. I will add the reference to RFC4832 like you stated. Is there a specific reason why you prefer the security related text be moved to the body of the document instead of the Security Considerations section? Regards Suresh On 02/28/2012 08:00 AM, Carl Wallace wrote: > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. > These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area > directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments > just like any other last call comments. > > > This document proposes initiation, utilization and termination mechanisms > for localized routing between mobile access gateways within a proxy mobile > IPv6 domain. The security considerations section introduces (for this > document) the requirement for IPSec and the reuse of a security > association described in RFC 5213. This text belongs in the body of the > document in my opinion, with the security considerations possibly changed > to simply reference RFC 4832 and RFC 5213 security considerations. > > >
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netext-pmip-… Carl Wallace
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netext-p… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netext-p… Carl Wallace