Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-hokey-key-mgm

"Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net> Tue, 11 August 2009 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF3F3A6980 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P69Ye2yXQtpQ for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from QMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C933A68E9 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OMTA22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.89]) by QMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SpMU1c0091vN32cABpfE0q; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:39:14 +0000
Received: from gwzPC ([71.231.55.1]) by OMTA22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Spj31c00101ae1j8ipj3eU; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:43:04 +0000
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@comcast.net>
To: 'Kurt Zeilenga' <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>
References: <369289D9-6E39-4673-B50E-0090BBBB6EB2@Isode.com> <00bf01ca19e0$1b703e70$5250bb50$@net> <B1002512-9406-4681-965C-17A7C189DF98@Isode.com> <004f01ca1a22$56af4de0$040de9a0$@net> <96E918F7-9D6D-4985-841E-5C170C7CF9F4@Isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <96E918F7-9D6D-4985-841E-5C170C7CF9F4@Isode.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:39:16 -0700
Message-ID: <005501ca1a24$8a9cd800$9fd68800$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcoaJAlC365MupZRTZGfP8CG2whQZAAAE9qA
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: gwz@net-zen.net, draft-ietf-hokey-key-mgm@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-hokey-key-mgm
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:39:40 -0000

Kurt Zeilenga [mailto:Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com] writes:

...

> >> My point that Section 6 description of what section 6.2 provides
> >> seems
> >> not equate (to me) to what 6.2 actually provides.  6.2 seems to
> >> discuss a particular issue in "transporting EAP keying material
> using
> >> an AAA protocol" as opposed to a more comprehensive "analysis on
> >> transporting EAP keying material using an AAA protocol".
> >
> > OK.  Can you be a little more specific about what needs to be
> changed?
> 
> The following change would align the text of 6 with the content of its
> two subsections:
> 
> OLD:
> This section provides security requirements and an analysis on
> transporting EAP keying material using an AAA protocol.
> NEW:
> 
> This section provides security requirements and a discussion of
> distributing RK without peer consent.

Thanks!

> 
> -- Kurt