[secdir] Secdir review of draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc5735bis-02
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com> Tue, 14 August 2012 16:20 UTC
Return-Path: <jsalowey@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AFF21F86EE; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GNeRGB9boGO5; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C4021F86EC; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jsalowey@cisco.com; l=493; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1344961203; x=1346170803; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Qi/SVNWWd5eYVEUxYbL8VXdSZ68XXcEpdBVzAnC985I=; b=NKNx/tpM0l/QV8zGGs5y0U5sO3IlG6v5ZRhsg6my9bPecU6z+oUy+W/i 50w5Y7yMRLA6z8DPu3bq98HFeeZWguefsVGgcw5Ao9LdFIMWwQ15J9Uey ubR3mvaSgCcmaBNY7T6TUAqLpuR2h4kqbhfapl30w2g0eygVuL+o/Uyg/ w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAKB5KlCtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABFuheBB4InEgEnUQE+QicEATSHa5g0oH2QVmADlUuOKoFmgl8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,766,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="111275631"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2012 16:20:03 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7EGK2MD024072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:20:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.97]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:20:01 -0500
From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc5735bis.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc5735bis.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review of draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc5735bis-02
Thread-Index: AQHNejinJ6NvvLUA/UO+WuNpel8VMw==
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:20:01 +0000
Message-ID: <9AE81B61-5E30-47A4-83D1-3903B1B231D1@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.33.248.153]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19112.005
x-tm-as-result: No--25.669900-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E91816E11FFB854783AE080EA9BB55ED@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc5735bis-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:20:04 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document describes the IPv4 address spaces reserved by IANA. I believe the document has an adequate security considerations section.
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-vegoda-cotton-rfc… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)