[secdir] Pre-IETF 110 SECDIR meetings

[Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>]

Hi SECDIR reviewers!

Thanks to all who responded to the availability.  Based on this feedback, we'll convene two meetings based on the Group 1 (Feb-16) and Group 2 (Feb-17) timezone construct.

==[ snip ]==
# SECDIR Per-IETF110 Meeting Agenda

## Discussion Items
* Welcome (Sec ADs)
* SECDIR Assignments (Tero)
* Hot Topics for IETF 100 Meeting (all)
* Hot Topics from recent reviews (all)
* Open Mic/Social 

## Group 1
Tuesday, February 16, 2021
> * UTC-8 (San Francisco): 0700
> * UTC-5 (New York): 1000
> * UTC: 1500
> * UTC+1 (Frankfurt): 1600
> * UTC+3 (Jerusalem): 1700

https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=mde85e0c1c949a5b4ac9531bed6b3bb04 
Meeting number: 185 357 2277
Password: f3CbpMpHm76

## Group 2
Wednesday, February 17, 2021
> * UTC-8 (San Francisco): 2100 (Tue, Feb 16)
> * UTC-5 (New York): 0000
> * UTC+2 (Helsinki): 0700
> * UTC+5 (Bangalore): 1030
> * UTC+7 (Bangkok): 1200
> * UTC+8 (Beijing): 1300
> * UTC+9 (Tokyo): 1400
> * UTC+10 (Sydney): 1600

https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m4d565f1d688f294be97897ed13ed4f26 
Meeting number: 185 992 0048
Password: i53xJud4QPx

==[ end ]==

Regards,
Roman and Ben

> -----Original Message-----
> From: secdir <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 6:15 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [secdir] Pre-IETF 110 SECDIR meeting(s)
> 
> Hi SECDIR reviewers!
> 
> While the pandemic has prevented us from meeting in person, your helpful
> reviews have continued to stream in and improve the quality of the documents
> the IETF has published.  Thank you for this diligence.
> 
> In recent virtual IETF meetings, there wasn't a convenient way to slot in our
> usual Tuesday lunch meeting.  However, we have now gone too long without
> getting together.  Therefore, we'd like to schedule two virtual meetings slots
> during the week of February 15th -- one that is relatively convenient for those
> in the UTC-8 to UTC+3 timezones (Group 1) and another that is convenient for
> those in the UTC+3 to UTC+10 timezones (Group 2).  The thinking is to roughly
> run our standing agenda of reviewing the SECDIR queue; reviewing recurring or
> emerging issues seen in documents; hot topics expected at IETF 110; and a
> general social hour, twice in these two time slots.  We also know that every is
> quite busy so attendance is optional and best effort.
> 
> To help us decide which exact time slot on what day works best, please
> complete one or both Doodle polls by Monday, February 8.  These polls will ask
> you to select among the following options.  Apologizes in advance for
> everyone's home city or timezone not being listed.
> 
> Choose: Monday, February 15 through Friday, February 19
> 
> ==[ For Group 1 (UTC-8 to UTC+3)
> Doodle:
> https://doodle.com/poll/ek882ytmqwgz4rfw?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=l
> ink
> 
> Timing source:
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20210216&
> p1=224&p2=179&p3=136&p4=83&p5=110
> * UTC-8 (San Francisco): 0700, 0800, 0900
> * UTC-5 (New York): 1000, 1100, 1200
> * UTC: 1500, 1600, 1700
> * UTC+1 (Frankfurt): 1600, 1700, 1800
> * UTC+3 (Jerusalem): 1700, 1800, 1900
> 
> ==[ For Group 2 (UTC+3 to UTC+10)
> Doodle:
> https://doodle.com/poll/75hzsnwtkqu373rd?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=li
> nk
> 
> Timing source:
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20210216&
> p1=110&p2=438&p3=28&p4=33&p5=248&p6=240
> * UTC+3 (Jerusalem): 0700, 0800, 0900
> * UTC+5 (Bangalore): 1030, 1130, 1230
> * UTC+7 (Bangkok): 1200, 1300, 1400
> * UTC+8 (Beijing): 1300, 1400, 1500
> * UTC+9 (Tokyo): 1400, 1500, 1600
> * UTC+10 (Sydney): 1600, 1700, 1800
> 
> Regards,
> Roman and Ben
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview