Re: [secdir] draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-06

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 20 May 2010 05:10 UTC

Message-ID: <4BF4C44B.9010806@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 08:10:35 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTilFNJasIBtqY5sHKaGC_Th7pC5VMk3YZ4rIkpu0@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilFNJasIBtqY5sHKaGC_Th7pC5VMk3YZ4rIkpu0@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gerardog@qualcomm.com, Jonne Soininen <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-06
Precedence: list

Donald,

Thanks for your review.

Jari

Donald Eastlake kirjoitti:

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's

ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the

IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments

just like any other last call comments.

This is an Informational draft discussing various IPv6 mobility

scenarios that involve interactions between MIPv6 and Proxy MIPv6

(PMIPv6). For security considerations, the draft refers to the

comprehensive Security Considerations section of RFC 3775 (Mobility

Support in IPv6) and to RFC 4832 (Security Threats to Network-Based

Localized Mobility Managemen). I am not an expert in this area and

found the shear amount of detail in this draft, which was produced by

merging 4 different earlier drafts, somewhat confusing. However, it

looks to me like the referenced security considerations sections and

the discussions in the draft cover security adequately.

Typos/Grammer:

Section 3, second sentence:

OLD

   This document does not

   ^^^^

   only focus on scenarios where the two protocols are used by the same

   mobile node to manage local and global mobility, but it investigates

   ^^

   also more complex scenarios where the protocols are more tightly

   ^^^^

NEW

   This document not

   only focuses on scenarios where the two protocols are used by the same

   mobile node to manage local and global mobility, but also investigates

   more complex scenarios where the protocols are more tightly

Section 3, page 9, line 4:

OLD

   depicted in the figure. However, the LMA and HA can be also

   ^^^^^^^

NEW

   depicted in the figure. However, the LMA and HA can also be

Thanks,

Donald

=============================

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)

155 Beaver Street +1-508-634-2066 (home)

Milford, MA 01757 USA

d3e3e3@gmail.com

[secdir] draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-06 Donald Eastlake
Re: [secdir] draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-06 Jari Arkko