Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Wed, 25 December 2019 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D53D1200A4; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 09:19:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lrj_8Q_ULnfF; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 09:18:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 321B112008A; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 09:18:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id u1so23120355ljk.7; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 09:18:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BgPttg34novKpTJ1ZNpQfjOKpwM5DsFq3mUyHPE4N5M=; b=KzneKkeSh0i01MRTQzYJwwjQVLojTHioqmOAGytBc+RHb1gfQY8CkJhfp6QQ5toxCU I0RJReoo6rekO+0eIeOa44ZxbKW26gtzy8V6djIU2FZSd4tJ0SdxxHsh8jV5e9D3lkvA bDRKC1c/6tbe0vnliPI8l0fRhsrJjbTFobNJDPDdKvkngKWIfVdqxqfHRKe4qkFs1daf Ilh67JBnR8+eM9vobIYYV6VjxbvCD1TCbMDzoqhut1y97JHwNh6SbjZgf+AHT0Z5njDe 8tJ7s9G+hvpzYdMTCgp9mnkyRJq+wYOnllJFGXzWegMGGMro/ABLax4XGF0w1Eol4oTD juow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BgPttg34novKpTJ1ZNpQfjOKpwM5DsFq3mUyHPE4N5M=; b=WXTyQ52cKpGz7apgEMxthUpW+PzZWVzCAOp58qhtLgrFyElDfxvfE8Xg4TZ07/vGr/ M3RKvRVla20fa+RSCNfHZckuRPiE9jrAkcgxYeoo8FGvqhvr65cGI2LqvyAqoEJ7fN/z yW7HKOuVPZgYUurxdzJdrunDX9bX0jXZ310zehNBp9H4LXEvEdHzTdJEV0zr9zPbntEd 4YnH9AC2IVnXBAGpQzyie/UKnG0HK0cC29q50Z+NxJA9yxRreEZAnJsVM/KeK00TKJ33 CZFIXfwqk7ts9WvkD+FffUcgZ3UjoWySYT+hsACqyWcTyKsFSyw8lxqmb4gz6hSZHely joTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVALoDJW3RAByyFxySR+bKvgBezVEcGfBo9g0CHKhlmN0Up6SIl ZuDRYEbl33uKvaXmIIJeLdf6iAHzPNz6hlWNfC0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxIRqAT0V6S61uavwcul4OBWcUhimZqMgU2lRYoefdDnh7VLq/kHAuIUaU4QCdLehux+R31LgwORyXhGvjB9xI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:80cc:: with SMTP id r12mr23811861ljg.154.1577294336203; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 09:18:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <02c101d5baef$de2cdd90$9a8698b0$@elvis.ru> <70FA58C0-97E1-4F76-B88B-A28101A46069@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <70FA58C0-97E1-4F76-B88B-A28101A46069@mit.edu>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 09:18:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=ijpHWR2kBiSAraniuB3vKdEaixahXkiU0Mh6xvUMSQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Uri Blumenthal <uri@mit.edu>
Cc: Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2.all@ietf.org>, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009da28a059a8a74a0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/kjoO6EM7uKs9hg1w015SdvJiq4c>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 17:19:01 -0000

On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 3:57 AM Uri Blumenthal <uri@mit.edu> wrote:

> NIST standards are mandatory for a subset of US citizens. But enough of
> businesses outside the US pay attention to what NIST says to make adding
> the reference relevant and useful.
>

It's not about standards, it's about the competition and the relevant
security level definitions. Not that I feel strongly about it, just a
suggestion.


> On Dec 25, 2019, at 01:52, Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Hi Watson,
>
>
>
> thank you for spending your time on this review in Christmas Eve.
>
>
>
> The capitalization issue has been already noticed and fixed.
>
>
>
> I’m not sure the draft should mention NIST levels, because
>
> they are relevant mostly for US customers. I think that
>
> generic recommendations on key sizes are more appropriate
>
> for this document.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Valery.
>
>
>
> Damn misclick. I meant With Nits.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 8:02 PM Watson Ladd via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Watson Ladd
> Review result: Not Ready
>
> Twas the night before Christmas
> when all through the house
> someone was desperately trying to get a review done on time.
>
> I didn't see anything wrong per se in the draft itself, but I found the
> capitalization of quantum computer an odd choice. IKEv2 is a complicated
> protocol, and I am not 100% sure that this draft does what we want it to:
> It
> would be great if someone could check very carefully in some symbolic
> model,
> ala what has been done in TLS. The guidance on sizes seems to rule out NIST
> level 1, but not any higher levels: might be worth calling out this
> explicitly.
>
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>
>
>
> --
>
> "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
> --Rousseau.
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>
>

-- 
"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
--Rousseau.