Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A854021F8B4A for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NS8L8tjIqjOw for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E60E21F867B for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:49266 helo=dhcp-1067.meeting.ietf.org) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1UFQHo-0004O0-PJ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:34:40 -0400
Message-ID: <513F3CFF.2010506@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:34:39 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Tsao, Tzeta" <Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com>
References: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB083602658653@EVS2.nam.ci.root>
In-Reply-To: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB083602658653@EVS2.nam.ci.root>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010305060903000806080202"
Cc: angel.lozano@upf.edu, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, vanesa.daza@upf.edu, secdir@ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com, "Alexander, Roger" <Roger.Alexander@cooperindustries.com>, mischa.dohler@cttc.es, adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:34:47 -0000

Tzeta,

Thanks for the message, and the explanation.  I was asked to re-review 
the doc because it
was scheduled for IESG review soon, which would imply that it was completed.

Feel free to send me email with any questions you have re my comments. 
I'm happy to provide additional
details.

Steve

On 3/12/13 10:14 AM, Tsao, Tzeta wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> It was just brought to my attention about your email on March 10 of 
> the subject SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01. I 
> wish to point out that it had been explicitly stated in the notice to 
> the WG of that revision that it still did not address SECDIR's 
> comments. At this juncture, because of the reorientation of the focus 
> of the draft, it would seem better to wait out for more input from the 
> WG before starting to consider how to best address the questions 
> raised in your comments.
>
> Let me assure you that there is no intention to side step your 
> comments and any such impression would mostly be due to my fault of 
> not communicating effectively.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tzeta
>