Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01

[Stephen Kent <[e-mail]>]

Tzeta,

Thanks for the message, and the explanation.  I was asked to re-review 
the doc because it
was scheduled for IESG review soon, which would imply that it was completed.

Feel free to send me email with any questions you have re my comments. 
I'm happy to provide additional
details.

Steve

On 3/12/13 10:14 AM, Tsao, Tzeta wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> It was just brought to my attention about your email on March 10 of 
> the subject SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01. I 
> wish to point out that it had been explicitly stated in the notice to 
> the WG of that revision that it still did not address SECDIR's 
> comments. At this juncture, because of the reorientation of the focus 
> of the draft, it would seem better to wait out for more input from the 
> WG before starting to consider how to best address the questions 
> raised in your comments.
>
> Let me assure you that there is no intention to side step your 
> comments and any such impression would mostly be due to my fault of 
> not communicating effectively.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tzeta
>