Re: [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis-05
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 23 April 2024 14:30 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF226C14E513; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8oh_A9oKiy3; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52AC3C14F69F; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9007B12EB6B; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:29:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 677C812F529; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:29:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <0419DBE9-0B6F-4BA7-B0CA-7EEBE6A22903@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_95E48E60-6824-4F61-9384-91362D7E142E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:29:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <EB0522B9-B1BA-47C1-A24E-01DB77FE2977@vigilsec.com>
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF SecDir <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis.all@ietf.org
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEHOBxpdVj-b1-VDAFRJpKyp9+xykVaY1XJUOmuDb=+HiA@mail.gmail.com> <EB0522B9-B1BA-47C1-A24E-01DB77FE2977@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=pair-202402141609; bh=F9Tmxo7T8bEMMgG0QFGdusCPaJHGnDXmHjgmSBizinM=; b=cBgO/pFlnac1uoI6AHNoEkltQKZqQ4fKyQDKUDA/RJM6ZSLZmFsGnlwzaAqY+nyFV2uSdX2if3bDyiHGHpS1661LwHgAgFF6+FISQIodrcvHOAKewSOpHfk7Dn0G4Uhj8q9kMKJE/2KPWtCGqjVAY0S3XbDlV0yng+hLiap6iLxvYufhflFgsD8Qv/Q09h86wy1xluqcbiYmYEFPhiqzTkF2h1GflrOVLdxeftb/1jIQLpWhdo3XcbW3xbTfz6ap/J84rfN/ghfINX5Isbsx3pVGFgkwaR80rXdqGcH+fc/dn9X2bGGYps2wFGi6DknM5fXAo5G9UeeVR+uPP31dvA==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/lbctOkKCFMIRpPUiR_l_YCEUv9U>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:30:10 -0000
I believe this resolves you comments: https://github.com/lamps-wg/rfc5990bis/pull/18 Russ > On Apr 23, 2024, at 10:11 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote: > > Donald: > > Thanks for the review. > >> Trivia: >> >> Note duplicated phrase in the 2nd sentence of this paragraph: >> The RSA-KEM Algorithm provides a fixed-length ciphertext. The >> recipient MUST check that the received byte string is the expected >> length and the expected length and corresponds to an integer in the >> expected range prior to attempting decryption with their RSA private >> key as described in Steps 1 and 2 of Appendix A.2. > > s/length and the expected length and corresponds/length and corresponds/ > >> Appendix A: Inconsistent capitalization: SS, ss > > s/same shared secret (ss)/same shared secret (SS)/ > > Also noticed: s/ssLen bytes fron/ssLen bytes from/ > > Russ
- [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc599… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-lamps-rf… Russ Housley
- Re: [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-lamps-rf… Russ Housley
- Re: [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-lamps-rf… Donald Eastlake