[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-03

"Scott G. Kelly" <scott@hyperthought.com> Mon, 09 July 2012 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <scott@hyperthought.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5B721F85FB for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8sJu2CF6PYz8 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp112.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp112.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.112]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1968521F85F2 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp51.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0A407206EF; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:13:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: from legacy10.wa-web.iad1a (legacy10.wa-web.iad1a.rsapps.net [192.168.4.112]) by smtp51.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A8AEC206F1; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:13:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hyperthought.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by legacy10.wa-web.iad1a (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FF17E0001; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:13:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: scott@hyperthought.com, from: scott@hyperthought.com) with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@hyperthought.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update.all@tools.ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Type: plain
Message-ID: <1341850399.47832875@apps.rackspace.com>
X-Mailer: webmail7.0
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:12:59 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document updates the IANA registry for DNSSEC algorithm numbers, changing 3 numbers that were set aside as placeholders but not subsequently assigned to "Reserved".

The security considerations section states that no new security issues are raised by this document, and I agree. I see no issues with this document.