[secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-18

["Dongjie (Jimmy)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Rich, 

Thanks a lot for the review. We will produce an update version to address your comments. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Salz via Datatracker [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 1:01 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-18
> 
> Reviewer: Rich Salz
> Review result: Has Nits
> 
> All page references are to the text version available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn/
> 
> I found it frustrating that the VPN acronym was explained in the Introduction
> but it wasn't until the bottom of p4 that NRP was spelled out.

We will expand NRP with brief description in the abstract and introduction.

> 
> Bottom of page 5 has "The required layered network structure ..."  Hubris? ;)
> Maybe "One possible layered network ..."

OK, we will make this change accordingly.

> 
> Other then that, the introduction does a GREAT job of explaining the motivation,
> issues, and technology involved. This holds true, analogously, for all the other
> sections. As a result, I am bothered that I have to say "it has nits" because they
> really pale in comparison to the rest of the text. Congrats to the authors.

Thanks:)
 
> I paid special attention to the security considerations and could not think of
> anything not already well-covered there.
> 
> Even if not addressed, this document is ready and really brings up the quality
> average of IETF RFCs.
> 
> 

Best regards,
Jie