[secdir] [new-work] WG Review: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (rtcweb)
The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Fri, 05 February 2021 18:05 UTC
Return-Path: <new-work-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5681A3A0E22; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:05:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1612548318; bh=9bx9vsKJEHcwcTlWKVctCwTOy3Kgn9nR0NK1MY7YkFM=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Reply-To; b=RRooCLNIxsIvjavFYzwUQzrYGnF0JBWwwkVh/Mpt7XY0mitVZ2vRUeHtzIDP6jpNU geslQjsP5OzO1FZGu3z+F49+emoLYu0daQ3RCaZNFhokaF0i1a29VXIpAjCc2CxZ6L 6e1UI4nJ3eSD7t6ET2kiutCPZ9PkiGxHlJxXE9U4=
X-Mailbox-Line: From new-work-bounces@ietf.org Fri Feb 5 10:05:14 2021
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451E83A0E23; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:05:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1612548313; bh=9bx9vsKJEHcwcTlWKVctCwTOy3Kgn9nR0NK1MY7YkFM=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Reply-To; b=Y9YZv1MSb0C7ZtZvvbkkA0yBmWSWDZTHRFI9LBsYjBCI3+/b3rhMNaqXEwME8U6cC IIXATYEEUImGoZuzmaPYmH20ItU77lwWtEs02Gnqm+9lJkH8mih2Tj0eAyF2uIRp1q qksAfzSugSHEKM958STJoVVeLXrXTaJtFsu7TrX8=
X-Original-To: new-work@ietf.org
Delivered-To: new-work@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C343A0DFE for <new-work@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:05:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: new-work@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply_to: <iesg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <161254830645.24177.3893434515314506627@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:05:06 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/new-work/JMmbvctcHvzlk8mRxrcxTZxyQ0c>
X-BeenThere: new-work@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Reply-To: iesg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: new-work-bounces@ietf.org
Sender: new-work <new-work-bounces@ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/m7AYl79u48yVCUINaNSebTWu4Hk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:06:45 -0800
Subject: [secdir] [new-work] WG Review: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (rtcweb)
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 18:05:23 -0000
A new IETF WG has been proposed in the Applications and Real-Time Area. The IESG has not made any determination yet. The following draft charter was submitted, and is provided for informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg@ietf.org) by 2021-02-15. Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (rtcweb) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Current status: Proposed WG Chairs: Sean Turner <sean+ietf@sn3rd.com> Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Assigned Area Director: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> Applications and Real-Time Area Directors: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> Mailing list: Address: rtcweb@ietf.org To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/ Group page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/rtcweb/ Charter: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-rtcweb/ The RTCWEB working group was originally chartered to standardize mechanisms that provide direct interactive rich communication using audio, video, collaboration, games, etc. between two peers' web-browsers, without requiring non-standard extensions or proprietary plug-ins. The result was a set of RFCs from RTCWEB, in addition to many other RFCs from other working groups, all of which are interrelated and had to be published together in what the RFC Editor refers to as a “cluster”. In the end, that cluster comprised more than 40 RFCs and was finally published in January 2021. During the run-up to publication of the cluster, a contradiction was identified between what became RFCs 8829 and 8843. A description of this contradiction was added to both documents to highlight the problem, and state our intention to proceed with publication but quickly initiate an effort to publish updates to the affected documents. The key part of the added text was as follows: “The specific issue involves the handling of "m=" sections that are designated as bundle-only, as discussed in Section 4.1.1 of [RFC 8829]. Currently, there is divergence between JSEP and BUNDLE, as well as between these specifications and existing browser implementations …” The working group is being reconstituted to take up this contradiction, come to consensus on a resolution, and issue Standards Track updates for those two documents. Specifically, the goal of this work is to address only the contradictions regarding "bundle-only" between BUNDLE and JSEP. The resulting aligned solution should avoid impacting the interoperability with SDP Offer/Answer. Finally, the impact on existing implementations that are affected by any change is to be considered. draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp, which has not yet been published, will be returned to the working group to be updated according to the resolution of the issue described above. The working group will therefore produce updates to the JSEP and BUNDLE documents, and re-submit draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp for publication after it has been revised. Updating any other document, or taking up any other issue, is out of scope and will require IESG approval via rechartering. Coordination with the MMUSIC working group to develop this solution will be required. Milestones: Aug 2021 - Update to draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp to the IESG as Informational. Aug 2021 - Updates to the JSEP and BUNDLE documents to the IESG as Proposed Standard. _______________________________________________ new-work mailing list new-work@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/new-work