Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356611A6F64
 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  2 May 2014 09:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
 autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id nDKw_ytOXF6K for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Fri,  2 May 2014 09:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com
 [209.85.212.170])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27651A084B
 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 09:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id f8so2473800wiw.1
 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 May 2014 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type;
 bh=xe7aW4XtYF6qwwLaFdUW0dXK+A1aaUY81bP/IUcp5MI=;
 b=RZgjbl3Mh61gWA2iUTj2hIDKxuAulxs6fwvxOrBm3rT71b9jqt9wTJJNsG1LFw1hRF
 Z3vEDITlPI84zPe2nvyfVBrudpaEdc4IlCeTXCVt4ETPZL0w+n36QdwLO2yE7mA38IZe
 LWJpP1B0kQFgPLDmSDJ8hkR46oxN+RCXaa164Er4F0bQ+GXGLQPaQAZVEk6952lfMeEp
 VdTBZNf/RYvB4Z+p+ucFxPRbRemgqDOTM8p/4HVszrWnSTCsrpqLb/0E7ryAWqtH1OQJ
 WHhH9Mm1JAMfhwqyLUErSn/7b1cIJjV17Gyipj76dD+BWeZeziyBF0XZZscJXjUb+iZp
 5maA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSP30PD+5Wi1SWSKJ4nMBht1GLE3oZ0xwU7ruAE4GRci3pS4UYPAEmya6+4Llnz+MvBbLv
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.181.5.6 with SMTP id ci6mr3633396wid.39.1399047566005; Fri,
 02 May 2014 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.54.162 with HTTP; Fri, 2 May 2014 09:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [66.84.81.44]
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 12:19:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKSzUQReSP9+AKzw_UxGW-L3WAD2k40Q7NZeh_PuSfBNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/mD8M2InCxnLav86Ca0QT1LuCLyc
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>,
 <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>,
 <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 16:19:30 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

tl;dr version: the document is ready.

This document does not define any management objects, it simply
defines a set of textual conventions which may be used by other BFD
MIB modules.

No realistic security issues here, move along....

W

