[secdir] Secdir review of draft-sandlund-rfc4996bis-02
Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Thu, 28 June 2012 12:14 UTC
Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B6821F84E2 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 05:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5i846xjP0Mg for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 05:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lvps83-169-7-107.dedicated.hosteurope.de (www.gondrom.org [83.169.7.107]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0619E21F84DE for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 05:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=ZIPULGAMq9H+7mDivVW7GkMq8N2vC+LoBVRKKAuDeNoqrUuknfxBuDLUHJNTj37yMNAEMYtG2mhg/tJqxx9BabD49aUPYK9vK6i5GTFKaDP82Mhq0b7CxCR7Ar1zGlL2; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type;
Received: (qmail 15828 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2012 14:14:44 +0200
Received: from 94-194-102-93.zone8.bethere.co.uk (HELO ?192.168.1.71?) (94.194.102.93) by www.gondrom.org with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Jun 2012 14:14:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4FEC4AB3.7070202@gondrom.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:14:43 +0100
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, draft-sandlund-rfc4996bis.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040200080606010604000107"
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-sandlund-rfc4996bis-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:14:55 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Please note that due to the fact that this is an update to 4996, this review covers only the diffs to RFC4996 and not the whole overall standard. As far as I could see the accumulated verified errata have been included successfully. Furthermore, to my understanding the proposed updates/changes do not require any new security considerations. Best regards, Tobias
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-sandlund-rfc4996b… Tobias Gondrom