IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Tue, 18 September 2018 00:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED54C128CF2; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czFO2bRHSXGT; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17D36126BED; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w8I08lja017465; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:08:47 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu w8I08lja017465
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1537229327; bh=2Dkea5VPzqrYEuk8ymCsZZMn1eA5Crz91FK94c2+cZI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QJ2+diZRbSgcPWQYpLkFdRI5HNemHoUpKqufij2be9dvGrUWPE/++HBcUpQuQWIsi Z9w/Ql1X+hKlbxXW6i/tGNks/AIQESDgPQdxrchXOfF8SqXbIyv0JxuTSxwi+7XyB3 fpMwu8re6dEnS4+CXfVPta/fi3zq1rWhZ5JOf4ao=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w8I08lJ8007123; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:08:47 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:08:46 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf.shepherd@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13
Thread-Index: AQHUTuPEhe9TIZsyvEO0NvXwVFmxWA==
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:08:46 +0000
Message-ID: <A96CC736-31D1-43AB-9D8E-3E2523A6B2D7@cert.org>
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC014C449262@marathon>
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC014C449262@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/mR1PuZwTqBNbmp3JrlE6Nl_PnWc>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:08:51 -0000

Oops. There was conflicting status in this write-up. It should be ‘ready’.

Roman

> On Sep 17, 2018, at 16:15, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Roman Danyliw
> Review result: Ready with nits
> Draft: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> The summary of the review is "Ready"
> 
> No new security issues are introduced with this draft.
> 
> Roman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email