Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 28 November 2019 07:13 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE531120C63; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:13:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4bFSDeifXX8; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:13:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D56D120C61; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:12:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id xAS7CbaF028522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Nov 2019 02:12:40 -0500
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:12:37 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: "Shawn M. Emery" <semery@uccs.edu>
Cc: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang.all@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20191128071237.GR32847@mit.edu>
References: <CAChzXmaHQa8QgyzVHrV09Gj9UHSm7tEiEsG60EJmw-hQenUXEg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAChzXmaHQa8QgyzVHrV09Gj9UHSm7tEiEsG60EJmw-hQenUXEg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/mW5qc3yAeKO1MFWRApHfRwPeoEg>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 07:13:10 -0000
Hi Shawn, Thanks for the review! I think the latest version of the template for YANG model security considerations is at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines (which does want a list of the subtrees and nodes are sensitive, so you are wise to call it out). -Ben On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 03:30:31PM -0700, Shawn M. Emery wrote: > Reviewer: Shawn M. Emery > Review result: Ready with nits > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. > These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security > area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these > comments just like any other last call comments. > > This draft specifies a YANG model for the Multi-Protocol Label > Switching (MPLS) Label Distribution Protocol (LDP). Network > Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) and RESTCONF is used > to mange network devices based on this model. > > The security considerations section does exist and for security > and privacy concerns, discusses that the MTI for NETCONF is > SSH and TLS for RESTCONF. For authorization, NETCONF > and RESTCONF uses the Network Configuration Access Control > Model (NACM). > > The section goes on to state that some data nodes > and RPC operations in the YANG module are considered sensitive > to various operations, but does not give guidance on which nodes > or subtrees that would be affected. In the past, module specifications > that I've reviewed have outlined each of these relevant items. > > The section finishes with the statement that the security > properties of the base specifications, LDP, LDP IPv6, etc., also applies > to this draft. I agree with the above assertions. > > General comments: > > None. > > Editorial comments: > > s/into following/into the following/ > s/means and be read/should be read/ > s/family"/family"./ > s/VPN Forwarding and Routing/VPN Routing and Forwarding/ > s/provides a mean/provides a means/ > s/Neibgbor/Neighbor/ > s/pereference/preference/ > s/creatable\/ deletable/creatable\/deletable/ > > RESTCONF should be expanded on first ocurence. > > Shawn. > -- > _______________________________________________ > secdir mailing list > secdir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir > wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
- [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07 Shawn M. Emery
- Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07 Benjamin Kaduk