Re: [secdir] SECDIR review: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-08
Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@apple.com> Wed, 02 December 2009 15:51 UTC
Return-Path: <lha@apple.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 3FB573A698C; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:51:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BeXXb9WAGNtR;
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182213A6811;
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay15.apple.com (relay15.apple.com [17.128.113.54]) by
mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525757B67F62;
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:51:14 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807136-b7bafae000000e8d-13-4b168cf243cc
Received: from elliott.apple.com (elliott.apple.com [17.151.62.13]) by
relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 99.ED.03725.2FC861B4;
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:51:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_RdRFHq0WKjLHWZmu3SgKyg)"
Received: from [17.151.93.129] by elliott.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System
Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008;
32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KU100HXU81DNA20@elliott.apple.com>;
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:51:14 -0800 (PST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Love_H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?= <lha@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671CF6707E@VENUS.office>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:51:13 +0100
Message-id: <FE613FF0-C56A-488F-9859-FE3018027F1E@apple.com>
References: <56A9F347-A2C5-41BA-B9AB-03647388ED02@apple.com>
<547F018265F92642B577B986577D671CF6707E@VENUS.office>
To: Thomas Dietz <Thomas.Dietz@nw.neclab.eu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1128)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:49:46 -0800
Cc: akoba@nttv6.net, Security-Directorat Directorat <secdir@ietf.org>,
ipfix-chairs@tools.ietf.org, IESG - <iesg@ietf.org>, muenz@net.in.tum.de,
bclaise@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>,
<mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>,
<mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:51:23 -0000
Thomas, Sorry, I think I really was after ipfixSelectorFunctions Since IPFIX does not define any Selector Function (except selecting every packet) this is a placeholder for future use and a guideline for implementing enterprise specific Selector Function objects. but lost myself in the indirection between ipfixSelectionProcessTable and ipfixSelectionFunctions. Since ipfixSelectionFunctions is part of security consideration I was just confused and you can disregard my mail. Love 2 dec 2009 kl. 16:30 skrev Thomas Dietz: > Dear Love, > > thank you for your review of our draft. Unfortunately I do not get your > point. The ipfixSelectionProcessTable is well defined in the IPFIX MIB. We > don't see any security implications in exposing the objects defined within > this table. They should not contain any sensitive data. Thus, we did not > explicitly mention this table in the security consideration section. Could > you please explain your concern in greater detail? > > Best Regards, > > Thomas > > -- > Thomas Dietz E-mail: Thomas.Dietz@nw.neclab.eu > NEC Europe Ltd. Phone: +49 6221 4342-128 > NEC Laboratories Europe Fax: +49 6221 4342-155 > Network Research Division > Kurfuersten-Anlage 36 > 69115 Heidelberg, Germany http://www.nw.neclab.eu > > NEC Europe Limited Registered in England 2832014 > Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand [mailto:lha@apple.com] >> Sent: Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 08:07 >> To: muenz@net.in.tum.de; bclaise@cisco.com; akoba@nttv6.net; Thomas >> Dietz >> Cc: IESG -; Security-Directorat Directorat; ipfix-chairs@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: SECDIR review: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-08 >> >> Hello all, >> >> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's >> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the >> IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the >> security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat >> these comments just like any other last call comments. >> >> ipfixSelectionProcessTable is left undefined, so it could possibly >> contain parameters that should not be exposed. >> >> Other then that I didn't find any problems. >> >> Love >> >
- [secdir] SECDIR review: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-08 Love Hörnquist Åstrand
- Re: [secdir] SECDIR review: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-… Thomas Dietz
- Re: [secdir] SECDIR review: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-… Love Hörnquist Åstrand