Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-richardson-roll-applicability-template-01
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Sat, 09 March 2013 06:26 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B3C21F854F for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 22:26:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.244
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.244 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rlqLEfiCrD6o for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 22:26:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C9F21F8528 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 22:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [209.128.20.133]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FED82206A; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 06:26:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sandelman.ca (quigon.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44277CA0C8; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:40:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
In-reply-to: <11d667a994d9c2f139958c2e605048fa.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
References: <11d667a994d9c2f139958c2e605048fa.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
Comments: In-reply-to "Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> message dated "Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:31:53 -0800."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:40:00 -0500
Message-ID: <16833.1362793200@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 04:46:50 -0800
Cc: secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-richardson-roll-applicability-template-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:26:41 -0000
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> writes: Dan> I have reviewed this document as part of the security Dan> directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being Dan> processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily Dan> for the benefit of the security area directors. Document Dan> editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any Dan> other last call comments. A new revision will be posted on Monday. -- Michael Richardson -on the road-
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-richardson-roll-a… Dan Harkins
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-richardson-ro… Michael Richardson
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-richardson-ro… Michael Richardson