Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11
Eric McMurry <emcmurry@computer.org> Tue, 10 September 2013 13:26 UTC
Return-Path: <emcmurry@computer.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DD721E8053; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.371
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.371 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JNB4v4UP5wNV; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B75D11E81A4; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r8ADPqkr002940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:25:53 GMT
Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8ADPn6t008944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:25:50 GMT
Received: from abhmt103.oracle.com (abhmt103.oracle.com [141.146.116.55]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8ADPmdF012081; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:25:48 GMT
Received: from ericlaptop.casamcmurry.com (/76.184.161.215) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:25:48 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Eric McMurry <emcmurry@computer.org>
In-Reply-To: <522EB7EA.5010207@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:25:47 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <563A86C3-662A-471A-A569-9C004317652D@computer.org>
References: <CE53ED6D.1CBD%carl@redhoundsoftware.com> <8D9934B4-948F-47A5-AB5E-02DEDD5277F0@gmail.com> <271A8F02-3A74-46E9-B08E-2D155EC3DDD3@computer.org> <351B6399-E47D-4041-A09F-712ED4570F40@gmail.com> <522EB7EA.5010207@cisco.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs.all@tools.ietf.org, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "lionel.morand@orange.com Morand" <lionel.morand@orange.com>, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:26:23 -0000
okay Benoit. I'll do that this morning. Thanks, Eric On Sep 10, 2013, at 1:10 , Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: > Actually, it might be better to quickly publish a new version (as opposed to me writing down a RFC editor note), because the IESG is still busy reading the document for this Thursday telechat. > > Regards, Benoit >> I would note down the change but implement/submit a revision after we get >> the rest of the IESG comments (the doc is in next week's telechat). That's >> because ADs (and others) are now reading the -11. >> >> - Jouni >> >> >> On Sep 10, 2013, at 6:24 AM, Eric McMurry <emcmurry@computer.org> wrote: >> >>> that matches what I came away with. How would you like us to address that? >>> >>> >>> On Sep 9, 2013, at 22:22 , Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> So if I got it right, the last sentence of the Req13 will be removed and >>>> the Req31 stays as it is now. >>>> >>>> This would be fine with me. >>>> >>>> - JOuni >>>> >>>> On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:27 AM, Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The intent was that the overload condition has granularity. That is, the >>>>>> overloaded node indicates an overload condition with some granularity, >>>>>> and later ends it. The act of ending doesn't change the granularity. We >>>>>> don't have an explicit requirement to be able to change the granularity >>>>>> of an existing condition. (Although we do not prevent a solution from >>>>>> offering that ability--but I suspect if the solution did that, it would >>>>>> involve multiple concurrent overload conditions, or ending one condition >>>>>> and starting another.) >>>>> Got it. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-overloa… Carl Wallace
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Eric McMurry
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Carl Wallace
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Carl Wallace
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Eric McMurry
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Benoit Claise
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Eric McMurry
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Ben Campbell
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-ove… Ben Campbell