[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-38
"Chris Lonvick (clonvick)" <clonvick@cisco.com> Tue, 03 December 2013 00:06 UTC
Return-Path: <clonvick@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72CE1ADFAA; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:06:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6RQcQQCEZIr; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005BE1ADF9A; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:06:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=918; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386029213; x=1387238813; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=MrK+y7lQ+yxhzwwMG16m6/FNmxyuhfXBxZ71XfBY2OI=; b=COZbs92iSmv0cFnbwTjfyQ6TK6p7gDkxI9gsOh1c3J2rryktGjhf9rwV So9UqG1lgMnIxMnBzint5qQKENC8EnXXIi2n277alOF1zxSz01lHAtqqv bk4x9xSeyQBEQMEsOdzWzJzD8Y8uDie1QQtLEFdOJn9DF2sIVTAv1RdLW k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAG8gnVKtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABZgweBC7hngScWdIInAQQ6UQEqFEImAQQBGod5wGUXjleDWIETA6ongymCKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,813,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="3806874"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Dec 2013 00:06:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB306jkv027439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 00:06:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.52]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 18:06:44 -0600
From: "Chris Lonvick (clonvick)" <clonvick@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: secdir review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-38
Thread-Index: Ac7vu4bQ+AfyoCPZRXihVXkn/C0tyQ==
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:06:43 +0000
Message-ID: <9BB92CB59918E1418A06FD4E3269FABE2AB64C64@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.154.201.104]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-38
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:06:56 -0000
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This is a re-review as I initially reviewed version -35. I noted there that this is a very long document and I was only able to review certain sections of that document. The subsequent revisions have not shortened this document any. Rather than attempt a new review, I checked the diffs from the version that I had previously reviewed up to this version. Again, I find the document to be very comprehensive and well written. I can find no apparent security issues with this document. Best regards, Chris
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc23… Chris Lonvick (clonvick)