Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus-08.txt
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 24 April 2015 21:04 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E901AC3B8; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgomxNjjrPly; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1BF81ABC0F; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t3OL4RRq058315 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:04:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:04:27 -0500
Message-ID: <11BD1537-EFC6-4F71-9160-9BFAC0F38FAE@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <sjmegn95jj3.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
References: <sjmegn95jj3.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/oO8l3v6PSZrhw50K3P6NI6ke0xI>
Cc: precis-chairs@tools.ietf.org, peter@andyet.com, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus-08.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:04:46 -0000
Hi Derek, The subject mentions draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus. I gather from the content, this was actually about saslprepbis? Thanks! Ben. On 24 Apr 2015, at 16:00, Derek Atkins wrote: > Hi, > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving > security requirements and considerations in IETF drafts. Comments > not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the > IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these > comments just like any other last call comments. > > Summary: > > Ready to publish > > Details: > > I'm not a SASLprep guru, so I haven't verified all the examples or > comparisons, but security wise I see no issues with this document. > > I have no other comments on this document. > > -derek > -- > Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 > derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com > Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp… Derek Atkins
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload… Ben Campbell
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload… Derek Atkins