Re: [secdir] What and who is SecDir?

[Glen Zorn <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 4/16/2011 1:02 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:

> Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> writes:
> 
>> For my part, I certainly think, Nico, that you do still belong here.
>> I'd hate to see people leave this directorate just because they no
>> longer chair any sec-area WGs.  That we don't always agree, as a
> 
> If that were the case I'd have left the directorate a while ago, and a
> number of current members would never have been on it (because they have
> not been chairs of security-area working groups).  I don't think that
> having a blue dot is a requirement to be on the sec-dir (although I
> think that the inverse is true, having a blue dot (in the security area)
> should require you to join sec-dir.

It depends: if the goal is to gather security clue, a blue dot in the
security area doesn't guarantee that; in fact, I can think of a couple
who should probably be excluded...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNq9PjAAoJEG4XtfZZU7RflakIALYTyM/jZW9mGKACgfCwsdFW
TLQmvhqQHIDx6LpuV0t7oP9Ggb/91RKlhO71ckF1faYIjc7PKkhoFwKHD2zpxZil
Du1BPYnmXQfSI9VlfSMR4kTKHPlnEzBcxk5V8j7ax+LhiqO76VvQ0Xdf7V/zmCzf
XP3zTV/SQ1j7wm9LwQ1P13jvtheeTtJr/RK4lOlAYzQYlXMqYaWi4Aqx0KXpxixa
IdHSBABccZoJuEU5siXFxLjlXyT01QafqC5So7kbrywrCDDx5dw/HW73lSv3Ff2L
0kXseTC3QH7Mc+Wc2jPyUdxC1LXnwbFMGXIhKLVInac1/dLe5CbuCLQq2bt30Gw=
=xKMM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----