Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10
Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Sat, 27 June 2015 16:45 UTC
Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC8A1A1B84 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id epWjFUaT3TyP for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D6131A1B4C for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcsj18 with SMTP id sj18so52286719igc.1 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0dGyLv7Q3XJadZqrtlZF+AXh4HvY/X3H6vSBzQegtWg=; b=UCO7ZggCy4rzmJNE2/WykrzZq8fPm7A4aivIvgIr9/aClBCyp9qUxodZs6I5EGpMxa jp9uHFnNfXRGwu7lBRvkG2g2jI0i7U7AYO24KUWmMI1zZcfH7Vn/ZIUEHhiuR81GKL2w 99CMiBIclAEVBkj1YM9NHtoRmS9RQ9r/Cn7ie5+YrS4nNHomKWFcXU3niJbXAheLEtvj UpUkFx8yrk/v/Hod8bJkP2IBHMVbfWuZN4o9gt5JmBZmOOPTp4wNPQtyT6CJDgKmfgHr Q9BtgPrfzQw0ADLVfD/TZU7VTQcUe4V+ot39EjRWKhVzqeNMMmrcw6Mey8aNVYrAeyNf /VGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmoEEEu7eV4uSN/sJFJGUvcN9DGS4c6uoLdj/Rgo7oJX05yQMR63ZqdIjyto1obfaw6220A
X-Received: by 10.50.87.74 with SMTP id v10mr4836913igz.37.1435423524741; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local ([2601:282:4201:ef5b:e0dd:a498:af68:ea6f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ij4sm1511985igb.7.2015.06.27.09.45.21 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <558ED320.2010700@andyet.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 10:45:20 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
References: <sjmd20ifg5c.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
In-Reply-To: <sjmd20ifg5c.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/omfx7-6TH39H5ybkx-SKxJWtHSw>
Cc: peter@andyet.com, xmpp-chairs@tools.ietf.org, fippo@andyet.com
Subject: Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:45:26 -0000
Hi Derek, thanks for the review! Peter On 6/26/15 1:01 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > Hi, > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving > security requirements and considerations in IETF drafts. Comments > not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the > IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these > comments just like any other last call comments. > > Summary: > > Ready to publish > > Details: > > I have no issues with this document as written. > > -derek >
- [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10 Derek Atkins
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-xmpp-dn… Peter Saint-Andre - &yet