Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-framework-09

Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com> Wed, 15 December 2010 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B54A3A7028; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:50:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1CIErephCaIn; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga03-in.huawei.com (usaga03-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.220]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C553A7021; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga03-in [172.18.4.17]) by usaga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LDG004LZU6IIP@usaga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:51:54 -0600 (CST)
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) by usaga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LDG00DL0U6GRO@usaga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:51:54 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:51:49 +0000
From: Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <4D0750C1.5090304@inrialpes.fr>
To: 'Vincent Roca' <vincent.roca@inrialpes.fr>, secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Message-id: <016501cb9c46$171d96d0$4558c470$@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-language: en-gb
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Thread-index: AQKvZF4Q8QK06FKZ0ufgR+A9rw6arZHZwjKw
References: <4D0750C1.5090304@inrialpes.fr>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-framework.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-framework-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:50:13 -0000

Thanks Vincent,

> Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.

Well, I shall ask the authors to treat them as comments that need to be
considered and discussed with possible document changes.

Were we to treat them like any other last call comments you would simply get a
response saying "thanks for your thoughts which we will examine to see whether
they can be useful, but please be aware that the last call completed some weeks
ago" :-)

Cheers,
Adrian