IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-06

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Wed, 28 October 2020 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AABE3A096B; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N_xNq2Xu6w3G; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4814D3A1090; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 09SE03lo025078; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:00:03 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374ADD17A7; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:00:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 2BeFXp7iXc5o; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:00:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (82-64-141-196.subs.proxad.net [82.64.141.196]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70809D17A1; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:00:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:00:00 +0100
Message-ID: <87o8kmfo2n.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-source-specific.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <160364731499.17476.11455568556595523172@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <160364731499.17476.11455568556595523172@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.1 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:00:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5F997963.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5F997963.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5F997963.001 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ow0NnNNK8AeFja9793AwL8Q7aIo>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-06
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:00:15 -0000

>   “A node MUST NOT send more that one Source Prefix sub-TLV in a TLV,
>    and a node receiving more than one Source Prefix sub-TLV in a single
>    TLV SHOULD ignore this TLV.  It MAY ignore the whole packet.”

> 2. This paragraph implies that a node might accept the TLV with more than one
> Source Prefix sub-TLV, but it does not state when a node can do that. You might
> want to elaborate on the conditions that a node is allowed to do that.

Right.  I've made this a MUST, which reflects implementation practice.
Group, please feel free to object if you think this is the wrong choice.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email