Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-05

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Wed, 14 October 2015 07:34 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E28B1B2BD3; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uS-zbiEq3NWz; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias244.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B39C21B2BCF; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.199]) by omfeda10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id EF6E9374401; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:34:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.60]) by omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id CAD66C8013; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:34:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06]) by OPEXCLILM7F.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::c1d7:e278:e357:11ad%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:34:12 +0200
From: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-05
Thread-Index: AQHRBihOez3/m1ZZ50yEZ1HEd2QNGJ5ql+tA
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:34:11 +0000
Message-ID: <15267_1444808052_561E0574_15267_17748_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F678F48@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1510091159450.26829@multics.mit.edu> <27748_1444745556_561D1154_27748_5857_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F677EDF@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1510132230020.26829@multics.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1510132230020.26829@multics.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F678F48OPEXCLILM21corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.10.14.70617
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/pETb8vMvJo80AB8EYYnZRua2MMo>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:18:03 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.all@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:34:17 -0000

Ben, Shraddha,

> From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:kaduk@MIT.EDU] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 4:31 AM
> 
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> >
> >
> > > In section 4.5, I do not see that the constraint "Traffic from A nodes to
> >
> > > I nodes must not go through R and T nodes" can be satisfied for the
> >
> > > leftmost pair of A nodes.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the careful review.
> >
> > My mistake. I missed the left part of the network.
> >
> > I see 2 options:
> >
> > a) add some network topology on the left part
> >
> > b) remove the leftmost pair of A nodes.
> 
> Option 'a' sounds good to me.

ok.

Shraddha, please find enclosed the updated "artwork".
My xml file is out of sync. You should only copy the figure   <figure anchor="Explicit_routing_topology" title="Explicit Routing topology">
 
-- Bruno

> -Ben

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.