[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-10

Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 05 January 2019 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2D4127598; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 06:31:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUq7e-sUCI2j; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 06:31:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x235.google.com (mail-oi1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A3BC1277BB; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 06:31:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x235.google.com with SMTP id v6so32597178oif.2; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 06:31:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version; bh=vuXY3Y/PFjgp3G0VvfLFj/Wa0yQGu+jfw/YXYqj4Hsk=; b=MlDqvpEj49F3Hdo6exWE95701PMkp4Xjs31gzbTBkG4X81INWadb8agv+bAcaGPej4 xZiu6rD0vY7XIdMo3Dyqx6BmpdI0E5YRZ+8rz53arlLeBNgpoSjQtwipOQ10+Q4VxqtZ Gcs1IflmfRQugrGRQxnXuP9dDHso0vttEmYZhPKzEOozh0ivB57TP4RHt1QRaBBHYGQ3 itAjl4wTFlBwYjJ9G8+6kFEP96UPE5OWQGR6zOhd13kGiL8/YpIqStp4q/5FgvHy5Zxl REfc4qCt4JRuCDWdjhfLT/pmnn2p8HqNpxjYbjaE60j73t4vayen2Fe/xGptQU7S6pLV lwpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version; bh=vuXY3Y/PFjgp3G0VvfLFj/Wa0yQGu+jfw/YXYqj4Hsk=; b=bKvueJa8u7+Ww01xDDuM8SSBxkQcuGzH/U4twzxVkupRQhf1PV7TKYvus2y7LSSDhf 0LIUiW0wu/GO9Ne04jXr/XokVMg+JV331xslX2cX4UQTI2WAhDphZNe5+7uwGTDaAHjE ggJ+VDKdWzq2hyM4Yffo/kdKE978skUnpP5z7UkGWFIsQEtUjV8tee6NCWak+UIZ8JiR scKdZ+R3LM6L72cw6+DS9dWVpIm+CBI5+g2aPslQugOW5k/+Pix6BzRFSwYwLKex8oGB +3dqxEamobRBvi5eNCDPUPn/Cmpsp8trUVPMKArsr+HNSzgdSw48QJcIqkcDWYmi6Xt3 ri8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUuke/UdpONl2r5V+RMcz+9tFhjwBD4GBj9704QK6ojB2AT3G9ME5L jjGIOw6xYvyK09Y/UtHETGTBJ/2O
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN42ZUNfyCoTOB2xBX6Ix7B2MRT6+j/TNIZ/MyKq2c+ATIK77ULOWgiGpyirWF7eQhtsDqQZLQ==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:b4c5:: with SMTP id d188mr3755287oif.309.1546698676215; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 06:31:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Chriss-Air.attlocal.net ([2600:1700:12b0:adf0:6527:4c0e:b195:8b9b]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t2sm27604170otl.4.2019.01.05.06.31.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Jan 2019 06:31:15 -0800 (PST)
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control.all@ietf.org
From: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5C30BFB2.2080004@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2019 08:31:14 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020909010000060904020601"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/qHTatHEW335sLHdfCV7sWjEuRVc>
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-10
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 14:31:19 -0000

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 
comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

The specification proposes new AV Pairs for the Diameter Overload 
specification found in RFC 7683. The Security Considerations section of 
this Internet Draft is brief and only points to the security 
considerations of RFC 7683. The Security Considerations section of RFC 
7683 is thorough and I believe that this is sufficient.

I briefly reviewed the ID and found no nits.

Best regards,
Chris