Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs

[Stephen Kent <[e-mail]>]

At 9:27 AM -0400 4/17/11, John C Klensin wrote:
>Steve,
>Two things:
>
>
>(1) Given the variable amount of time it takes to get RFCs
>issued/ published after IESG signoff, are you and the WG sure
>that you want to tie the phases of the phase-in procedure to RFC
>publication?

It probably would help if the IESG coordinated with the RFC Editor to 
try to avoid having any problems here. But, we anticipate that the 
durations for the phases will be long enough so that a few months in 
the RFC editor's queue can be managed.

>
>(2) There is an incomplete sentence at the end of (2): "This
>allows CAs to issue certificates under" (more context below).
>
>    john

Whoops.  The final sentence should be:

This allows CAs to issue certificates under the new format before all 
relying parties are prepared to process that format.


Steve