[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-07

Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com> Mon, 05 July 2010 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A5F3A6823 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.049
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.699, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3wT6PUbxjTj for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s87.loopia.se (s87.loopia.se [194.9.94.112]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67E03A685C for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s29.loopia.se (s34.loopia.se [194.9.94.70]) by s87.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2A22F5349 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 63965 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 07:36:53 -0000
Received: from 213-64-142-247-no153.business.telia.com (HELO [192.168.1.9]) (stefan@fiddler.nu@[213.64.142.247]) (envelope-sender <stefan@aaa-sec.com>) by s29.loopia.se (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for <draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states@tools.ietf.org>; 5 Jul 2010 07:36:53 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:36:51 +0200
From: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
To: <draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C8575833.C26C%stefan@aaa-sec.com>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review of draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-07
Thread-Index: AcscFNUUT4X1N6sDuk2IQZbZPDrEWg==
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3361167413_15768803"
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:36:56 -0000

I¹m the assigned Secdir reviewer of draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-07.

However, this draft does not define any protocol. It¹s purpose seems limited
to define document states in the standardization process. As such I don¹t
think there is anything in this document that needs a security review.

/Stefan