[secdir] Re: [Idr] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-07

Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com> Wed, 02 April 2025 02:15 UTC

Return-Path: <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48F7162BD60; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MBEPMxv25z8L; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out203-205-221-221.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-221.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9E4F162BD5A; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1743560135; bh=us+YYSB1I76nlEdWgxvz2+ik8UwZY1zc0r1BPObgu3Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References; b=dzAra3VDURU0inYp/3WfTcZ6+navc31QgOOdhjst9CFZ9eH2RKz5HygxAq1V4CBwT HbCaC9pzMPhaMtxVbGeFd4M7Sf+P4O1itxge29nk9RqKZwC2+xGCiK7KB9YOJjmFzJ v973c6l33sB6Wibu4kAOCpg8tLTPGb9A0jWJ/gHE=
Received: from LAPTOP-BOBOCIFS ([36.112.201.18]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszc13-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 3E1860FD; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 10:15:33 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1743560133t1jeoqkqh
Message-ID: <tencent_9B5265602160BED8F52EE012C79699566C06@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: NIBco6FKK+x4DPS1XfJE9LRdY8rGEQqmVGkKaCFklA2OXQCicxGkp1x6U30/kU OgRw/3nblo/cRa2JoWVkwAb1oV2BoduFA3ZOtCBBtKvhnhpbeomyB6vOJkV3QToZYlkKnOCraqQq dQgJJMqB7s+F9zihfi6U2+RZM1H05BvECCPO/MU3relKb6HXiItUq/ZjN8+Dni2VV8Kq0ixMnQVs IAjGZfIEUbQXyf3P/dlXly8QVGsXVgtmTzkOI1FKorkgnNzI3zaRX0Ps47j30mNaqqRzfDIXwQ88 hnQcP31OzEn/Wdrw5EHcL5EsRAAziUESF80U63nLKl5hkP9mR442vD8w8z0df4+0zj3sntyTsVnv N8syUeo8ZEEpYguQMm8xDhEELCocJlj37pl99FodEQxivX2X70iXK94F+TjhfZNNNRsboJgH65Fy XwcuvGJrzhEftB/shviCINSy+QzwQlxXxZH6lH6X3fogP9lUB/SOMt/xskiAV7Eohqlzx3TNw4+y 5KQf9MGM+DnzacT2iaYLadR7FfiJrLlfNHQf0fv4bRCsxaHul+0aeoMIQXS/6OpBpGAAL7/l1NiN 8wEgBIH6j193eETx9/nYjKlyCusaB4t67eJZJmRbrlxSi47PlZH/VOt+VUoizXq/7TWRNa2CWht0 oKCxzPZK0zoJsypA703hge5DX8hwy/0EzsyaZfA70aPjSwFsKTJqTc7APqhee+C2gz2HurfGnftv A5ChPFL9vs6RTho+aQYuevrYJov5R0SNzftBEcBPIbNO1Q33Ch3fiYzPsDeK3L2Pprp1w2nXEiuR qIfQ+VOwmMgpc/J164ba49R9okCUKJ4PKSE2WUQv87Ws/ZZv6bdDtQImZ75Z/gl1fY6Oe/dkcGtC rf/Uat7+HRrPR/LXMZtygFe5GGRh6VO1cBu09GsoMBR4IVNKFrj6uPDvxI4CU08O51IIaMb0PVBO lrTYGzhnAaNG6SQV6EAU1Nk4JFranR/LYr0zKeBfYPF2paxycEFH1KTJcO46NE
X-QQ-XMRINFO: OD9hHCdaPRBwq3WW+NvGbIU=
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 10:15:33 +0800
From: Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
To: Corey Bonnell <corey.bonnell@digicert.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <174352941824.2400981.12168934690121725088@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 6DCE924D-3CB2-407B-9BC7-453D346B4965
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.331[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OQ-MSGID: <2025040210153315316711@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart770527401873_=----"
Message-ID-Hash: HOTZXKW4RJTM33OMQLZH5XFK5SJ4GGWI
X-Message-ID-Hash: HOTZXKW4RJTM33OMQLZH5XFK5SJ4GGWI
X-MailFrom: chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt.all" <draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt.all@ietf.org>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [secdir] Re: [Idr] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-07
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/qn1baoDnbcrAmq5y74N2dd5g9rY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Corey,
Thank you for your review.  Your comments will be incorporated into the next version, we will fix the nits, and state the security considerations for BGP-LS are applicable in the Security Considerations section.

Best regards
Chongfeng

From: Corey Bonnell via Datatracker
Date: 2025-04-02 01:43
To: secdir@ietf.org
CC: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt.all; idr
Subject: [Idr] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-07
Reviewer: Corey Bonnell
Review result: Has Nits
 
Typos in Section 4:
 
s/new mechanism/new mechanisms/
 
s/scalable solution/scalable solutions/
 
General comment:
 
Although it does not appear that this document introduces any additional
security considerations, I believe the security considerations for BGP-LS
itself are applicable. The Security Considerations section should state that
for clarity (preferably with references to the relevant RFCs).
 
 
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list -- idr@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to idr-leave@ietf.org