Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid-05
Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Mon, 18 December 2017 22:34 UTC
Return-Path: <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CB012D9FF; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:34:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H_FIOWsgK4Oe; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usplmg21.ericsson.net (usplmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E1312D964; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:34:28 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c6180641-81dff70000007a40-52-5a384274f002
Received: from EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.84]) by usplmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7E.44.31296.472483A5; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 23:34:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:34:27 -0500
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
To: R Atarius <r_atarius@yahoo.com>, Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org" <draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir last call review of draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid-05
Thread-Index: AQHTcEswWEf3/OfoNEiMaHuZjaej1qM5thfAgBBZ2AD//7AEEA==
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:34:26 +0000
Message-ID: <2DD56D786E600F45AC6BDE7DA4E8A8C118D31E02@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <151270040464.5892.16248327802973779967@ietfa.amsl.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233AA7218B@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <2DD56D786E600F45AC6BDE7DA4E8A8C118D2234D@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <458960847.867887.1513635604655@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <458960847.867887.1513635604655@mail.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.12]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2DD56D786E600F45AC6BDE7DA4E8A8C118D31E02eusaamb107erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPiG6Jk0WUwdJJMhb3521ltHi8eDaj xbON81ksei5YWnxY+JDFgdVjVsNado8lS34yecyadZgpgDmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK2Pi/lOM BR37GCvaFr1mbGBs2cnYxcjJISFgIjGn6RKQzcUhJHCEUeLylZmsEM5yRokdLZ+ZQKrYBIwk 2g71s4PYIgIFEs/XvGADKWIWWMQocXXZQ7CEsECUxN8d25kgiqIlup/8hrKdJFretoPVsAio Spy5858FxOYV8JVYsWsNE8S2H4wS394eBWvgFLCRuPxtLVgRo4CYxPdTa8DizALiEreezGeC uFtAYsme88wQtqjEy8f/WCFsJYk5r68xQ9TnS8zZ85wdYpmgxMmZT1gmMIrMQjJqFpKyWUjK ZjFyAMU1Jdbv0ocoUZSY0v2QHcLWkGidM5cdWXwBI/sqRo7S4oKc3HQjw02MwFg7JsHmuINx b6/nIUYBDkYlHt6FBhZRQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4/c6aRwnxpiRWVqUW5ccXleakFh9ilOZg URLnPefJGyUkkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpgNEtyXrBj/b0nn2XMjigoTX51bV/4/vDCY0nq DTwvtL6tbmpYvq5PQr/PnaOa83CtiLFHx/KMacGNvjM1nsmzV1sdfFF1c17LWakLzuILSxfM tZ3w6NqkM5WpGwJb5Jd1/Akr4Kl/eoP7zyV130zvBM4DesY7PM0Oczos3hGx5knegfllr583 KrEUZyQaajEXFScCAKXYFpuxAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/qp96_NDQ-pONB6b7-0UZoCi8Htw>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:34:31 -0000
This works for me. Yours, Daniel From: R Atarius [mailto:r_atarius@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 5:20 PM To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>; Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>; secdir@ietf.org Cc: draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid-05 Daniel and Andrew, Note that "simultaneously" was omitted in Andrew's proposal which was agreed by Daniel. However, I think this wording should be kept in the sentence. Therefore, I am suggesting to keep "simultaneously" in the sentence and have it as "To achieve this the mobile device needs to simultaneously communicate via both the IP/SIP/IMS domain and the circuit switched domain." Thanks Roozbeh ________________________________ From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com<mailto:daniel.migault@ericsson.com>> To: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com<mailto:aallen@blackberry.com>>; "secdir@ietf.org<mailto:secdir@ietf.org>" <secdir@ietf.org<mailto:secdir@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org>" <draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org>>; "ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 9:39 AM Subject: RE: Secdir last call review of draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid-05 Thanks the addresses fully my minor comment. Yours, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Allen [mailto:aallen@blackberry.com<mailto:aallen@blackberry.com>] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 12:37 PM To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com<mailto:daniel.migault@ericsson.com>>; secdir@ietf.org<mailto:secdir@ietf.org> Cc: draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org>; ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org> Subject: RE: Secdir last call review of draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid-05 Daniel When talking about SIP and IMS Registered has a specific connotation means SIP registered. The is no SIP Registration between the mobile device and the CS domain so using registered might be misleading. You are right that in the single radio case the mobile device is not simultaneously attached to both the IMS and CS domain. It would be in the dual radio case. Maybe change that last sentence to To achieve this the mobile device needs to communicate via both the IP/SIP/IMS domain and the circuit switched domain. Andrew -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Migault [mailto:daniel.migault@ericsson.com<mailto:daniel.migault@ericsson.com>] Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 9:33 PM To: secdir@ietf.org<mailto:secdir@ietf.org> Cc: draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid.all@ietf.org>; ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org> Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid-05 Reviewer: Daniel Migault Review result: Ready Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready Some comments / questions: 1. Introduction This specification specifies how the URN namespace reserved for 3GPP2 identities and its NSS for the MEID as specified in draft-atarius- dispatch-meid-urn [8] can be used as an instance-id as specified in RFC 5626 [2] and also as used by RFC 5627 [3]. <mglt> I think it would be good to have the acronyms (URN, 3GPP2, NSS, MEID) expanded in the introduction section as it is being done in the abstract.</mglt> 3GPP2 defines High Rate Packet Data (HRPD) with high data rates and it dispenses with the 1x Circuit Switched (1xCS) infrastructure. This means that with HRPD networks, voice calls will need to be conducted using IP and IMS. However, the transition to all IP, SIP based IMS networks worldwide will take a great many years from the time of this writing and mobile devices will need to operate in both IP/SIP/IMS mode and circuit switched mode. This means that calls and sessions will need to be handed over between IP/SIP/IMS mode and circuit switched mode mid-call or mid-session. To achieve this the mobile device needs to be simultaneously attached via both the IP/SIP/IMS domain and the circuit switched domain. <mglt> I am questioning whether "registered" would not be better appropriated than "attached". My reading of attached is a dual radio case while "register" seems to include the single radio. I might be wrong as well.</mglt>
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-atarius… Daniel Migault
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ata… Andrew Allen
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ata… Daniel Migault
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ata… R Atarius
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ata… Daniel Migault