[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-12
Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com> Tue, 26 October 2010 18:38 UTC
Return-Path: <clonvick@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9DF3A68FB; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r4i041O1tIcr; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0E83A6877; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EANa9xkyrR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACTWAGNdnGlEJxAhUgEhFc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,242,1286150400"; d="scan'208";a="610037537"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2010 18:40:10 +0000
Received: from sjc-cde-011.cisco.com (sjc-cde-011.cisco.com [171.69.16.68]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9QIeAQa001734; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:40:10 GMT
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:40:09 -0700
From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, rbarnes@bbn.com, draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis.all@tools.ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1010261132430.4606@sjc-cde-011.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-12
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:38:55 -0000
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Overall, I find the document to be of good quality and can find no security related concerns that have not been addressed. Thanks, Chris
- [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3… Chris Lonvick