[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07

Stephen Farrell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 29 May 2019 11:15 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <155912851606.5505.8128704305266794780@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 04:15:16 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/quVGSvnDSqtRBZTERbnYk8XxTZ4>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07

Reviewer: Stephen Farrell
Review result: Has Nits

I'm not sure if this is a nit or not:

The draft describes uses of PCE involving multiple domains.  But the "domain"
concept in this case seems to encompass both/either different administrative 
domains and/or different technology domains within a single administrative
boundary. If it's realistic, wouldn't it be good give recommendations as to what
to do at least when administrative boundaries are being crossed? (E.g. "use
TLS" in that case.)

Other than that the draft appears ready to me.

[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pc… Stephen Farrell via Datatracker