Re: [secdir] Email statistics for SEC WGs
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 24 July 2009 10:59 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BB53A68FC for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b9Rmm29bOx1p for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SG2EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (sg2ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.51.77]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158E23A6A0F for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail91-sin-R.bigfish.com (10.210.100.254) by SG2EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.210.112.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.340.0; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:43:02 +0000
Received: from mail91-sin (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail91-sin-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B0F151020E; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:42:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -26
X-BigFish: VPS-26(zz1432R98dN936eM1b0bMzz1202hzzz2dh6bh87h61h)
X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0
X-FB-DOMAIN-IP-MATCH: fail
Received: by mail91-sin (MessageSwitch) id 1248432174763617_19829; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:42:54 +0000 (UCT)
Received: from imx2.tcd.ie (imx2.tcd.ie [134.226.1.156]) by mail91-sin.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE09C0046; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:42:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Vams.imx2 (imx2.tcd.ie [134.226.1.156]) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with SMTP id 18E9268003; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:42:59 +0100 (IST)
Received: from imx2.tcd.ie ([134.226.1.156]) by imx2.tcd.ie ([134.226.1.156]) with SMTP (gateway) id A042D51441E; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:42:59 +0100
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (sfarrell.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B9768004; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:42:59 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <4A699034.3030504@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:43:00 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB773A7141A98B@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com> <4A698A7E.2070602@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A698A7E.2070602@isode.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus-Status: MessageID = A142D51441E
X-AntiVirus-Status: Host: imx2.tcd.ie
X-AntiVirus-Status: Action Taken:
X-AntiVirus-Status: NONE
X-AntiVirus-Status: Checked by TCD Vexira. (version=1.60.2 VDF=10.109.8)
Cc: "Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com" <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Email statistics for SEC WGs
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:59:00 -0000
Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com wrote: > >> FYI: Here's some data about how active the WG mailing lists in >> security area have been in 2009. >> >> I'm not sure what conclusions can be drawn from this -- different >> WGs are in different phases of their work, have different number >> of work items, and communication styles are different. But perhaps >> someone finds these interesting... >> >> Emails on WG mailing list from 2009-01-01 to 2009-07-21 >> (some spam excluded manually when it would have had a big >> effect on the numbers): >> >> WG messages/month >> ========= ============== >> dkim 240 >> ipsecme 139 >> sasl 103 >> >> > Wow. Do we get prises for the number of emails posted :-)? Only the sensible ones. That might well take our WG off the top of the list;-) S.
- [secdir] Email statistics for SEC WGs Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
- Re: [secdir] Email statistics for SEC WGs Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [secdir] Email statistics for SEC WGs Stephen Farrell