IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-05

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Thu, 12 March 2020 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548E23A0766; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XzeIrxAiI0EM; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02EFB3A0755; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id q10so3447543lfo.8; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2jOReqRALxHXkPED2FxK1wwo0TvGecfrDFmwsp4F0Mg=; b=LcNRz/sPgu/eIFkIJ1DjzPmgrBX6wiq8yCF6xomo6ujqEo5l84MLT6Y4fRUoAcN6+i 7GpSVCgiBZBptHTgvwVkiSeRM5X9ndJ2fvgzJp+jnLEyTeGKxHpg2FeMO7x5jutnccDw A9rGlxTMBGVGUBARO9lRCqQ+Ab0ZkIY/wdqS6pqhJXPcG2a/Pf8c3t/xuQFafCZ2EQ/a 1jCHBgW/v8Z69O29ZGEC80z99hl2FZuirFG7lNEr49vkheXiwwty453+nt2nmIXpuTt7 pTYU9A1JjJEzGe/zCEbM8TBUbN9a6pOaI6QALAd5gDwQvKbFB8wFPo+C2LKZegcUd3yb b+UA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2jOReqRALxHXkPED2FxK1wwo0TvGecfrDFmwsp4F0Mg=; b=Qzii54Ii0IbhblbiJyeCr1sED2nB3QNOcSqsNRFdQws7Ixs8zcvhVAMHYftcYK+NO9 8GMBgbUPFG+2pWqiP03A//xiwfA+L0XljPlzljgkX3DRDH8WFrsfiMudRlPaoxhEgA7u oqcXhyAvqnZGJAqvCyHFIKyAT/XloxGzTV5UbU65DLfdXANB0omXdD0U+5maM6bgND38 u/1CDEnDPCv5eBMOkV5feQ2mUtfAvY4rSsQKVMKgu3jYV6f4ShGNF16+Btubo4rJ4l/t RI4VkA9+Btw6TbC2YcEcQOwXrDMRUGCNJWhB/kxrQ+bKZ3eMhDwoLLgND0ZdDc7WaRtM Xc1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1FRJWei0fnyrSz1TkJT/fJUtl8GEU7iTWFaPKfjXEPxkr+KQtY gI+NLUDd0Ozew0Ja+YpDmiGsfP+U+jCfhgR82nk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsTo6e0DQ7TC/AU8O72+/uF3faJK1HWjpuFWp6Gw2gTqAS4fRD1yXehL+BoqN1HB5iFpONpj/S7Ud4TgvM/HT4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4906:: with SMTP id n6mr3824501lfi.163.1583980183014; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158389693039.16158.6977515080330200081@ietfa.amsl.com> <E15E2A3F-5EAA-4B86-B39A-14521AD762D5@gmail.com> <CACsn0cnxjPf3ziSQbjdLmD+1xUJtcDF3kSbz0LiSj=b_safb2A@mail.gmail.com> <137FCA36-3B7C-46EB-B951-3FDC01560069@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <137FCA36-3B7C-46EB-B951-3FDC01560069@gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:29:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmQ0pzGF9MxVWGx-gMUOR6eR7zkKhnMPDx-876xt-H3sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-detnet-mpls.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/rAy-lvspfQ_TotmN3hGnk7r3WuQ>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 02:29:46 -0000

I don't see any reason why RFC 3552's guidelines shoudn't apply to this draft.

If there is a MPLS exception I'd like to see the rules that should be applied.

As is I don't see any reason why the assumptions can't be explicitly
spelled out, either in the Security Considerations or elsewhere.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email