Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-11

"Leaf Yeh" <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com> Mon, 20 May 2013 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB05421F92E8; Mon, 20 May 2013 08:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsWmPlG8nHQp; Mon, 20 May 2013 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com [209.85.220.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01F021F92E3; Mon, 20 May 2013 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id bj3so5824182pad.15 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 20 May 2013 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=xH6PuOy/gjVfLAtvalSSmCj9dVgrXtwB+hB05cfxZoU=; b=v92WJlXVhjBF0SMcaVci/602xb0yMj5OOBlpaIleY7ESBQV6vOj2gWEc5QZzfoeQLs CcPscjfLb7SyZhRMClTN0OXmAzYnetQ1eP1uzdTUvJVjfxNZzhIxkf7aHyY4BckJwhGY iFEgk43VvnEDC3sa5wbWNnN2bdMWLPMSfpaAhjEGvFQFDXbDWZqGQeIVCgVkaAq1+q3E UnZzYolZ6T1kNqEiHAj2wnJMmLAOvmXuXsH49R0nJHkuYfK5Cj3uLY8Z3050v4gDSd+T vXZ/QoX9gbBt92x+2oKWANf6GtjDfZdd3J/du2rOoow2/Drxxg8xdta5cDnmuhzpyebI LlnQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.110.133 with SMTP id ia5mr60712412pbb.111.1369064834520; Mon, 20 May 2013 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PC ([221.223.164.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm26308882pae.18.2013.05.20.08.47.09 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 20 May 2013 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
To: 'Tero Kivinen' <kivinen@iki.fi>
References: <20885.20435.315856.407689@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <51967458.22d9440a.44f5.7843@mx.google.com> <20886.31527.670959.767940@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <5197814e.04fc440a.31ee.7730@mx.google.com> <20890.8433.87412.68437@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20890.8433.87412.68437@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 23:47:06 +0800
Message-ID: <519a4582.0615420a.5710.ffffe9c5@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac5VW4MWvPldzsaLRA60cIkaWTtvugAEGhmg
Content-Language: zh-cn
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt.all@tools.ietf.org, 'Tomek Mrugalski' <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, 'Ted Lemon' <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 15:47:19 -0000

FYI, the draft has been ver.-12, the updates can be found @
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-12 .


Best Regards,
Leaf



-----Original Message-----
From: Tero Kivinen [mailto:kivinen@iki.fi] 
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 9:11 PM
To: Leaf Yeh
Cc: iesg@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt.all@tools.ietf.org; 'Tomek Mrugalski'; 'Ted
Lemon'
Subject: RE: Secdir review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-11

Leaf Yeh writes:
> The text in section 9 will be 'The allocation policy of this 'RADIUS 
> attributes permitted in DHCPv6 RADIUS option' registry is Expert 
> Review <xref target="RFC5226"/>. Designated expert should carefully 
> consider the security implications of allowing the relay agent to 
> include new RADIUS attribute for the addition to this registry.' OK?

Looks good.
--
kivinen@iki.fi