[secdir] New boilerplate for reviews

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBEA1A6FB2 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:52:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFfr_jubIQoz for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:52:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com (mail-lb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 545691A1DFA for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:52:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id b6so1031407lbj.36 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:52:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ue9qLtbtIOxPxefn/88FH8aCUhXsY+VizUgtG/dt+Eg=; b=Xtm73Yh2g0YPudvzC5/gto0qbMta6XLl6ZeHEJrqGyV+nCrtpxWk4MnclWzL5/rZaw f0O3VJVC2kHOyyDRCnyhUX/mZqHDhm+X3NZoB5jz/j8ijf1OViSDpF4BznJ/nkRf6jOT dMad/5hB1DyW99WnY6W1w7MJsuz/1R25fFhtyNrkmausGWaWoGdiwt9zw3l0tYMEWiqg 35QMadI4WiB6a5MicVJilIktT4mIAsMIO3hNGJQx9lkkidQGozhRrLrZ9NrOLnUEusrU HyiQbJaWrMHEEZ3eU8P4bmkxMoRFxDgCPbNIHCGoGpVZdf3Latjh2XyX8ryarRnVTBmp Lwrw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id n9mr23616835lan.61.1418151159881; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:52:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH7wMVfao4CmrQHvesyF6+an5eDkucMXYWo+=v=3YSf8cA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/raTc8UwZthELt1BTSZff2rO-Ws8
Subject: [secdir] New boilerplate for reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:52:43 -0000


Stephen & I worked on an alternate boilerplate for reviews per request
from several ADs as editors are a bit confused with the current text.
They are not sure what to do with the reviews.  Ideally, we'd like
them to address your comments during last call and then Stephen & I
can pick up points that were not adequately addressed.

Here is a proposal for alternate text, let us know what you think:

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving
security requirements and considerations in IETF drafts.  Comments
not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the
IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

Thank you.


Best regards,