Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr-06
Rahul Aggarwal <rahul@juniper.net> Thu, 22 October 2009 01:19 UTC
Return-Path: <rahul@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13D63A685A; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w8YcmOop+YYw; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEC13A63D3; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSt+zLMPVDVA0EdQSfFKN4u1Pt8ptVvJr@postini.com; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:19:45 PDT
Received: from p-emfe01-sac.jnpr.net (66.129.254.72) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.375.2; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:17:28 -0700
Received: from p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net ([66.129.254.47]) by p-emfe01-sac.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:17:28 -0700
Received: from emailsmtp55.jnpr.net ([172.24.18.132]) by p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:17:27 -0700
Received: from magenta.juniper.net ([172.17.27.123]) by emailsmtp55.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:17:27 -0700
Received: from sapphire.juniper.net (sapphire.juniper.net [172.17.28.108]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id n9M1HRj62581; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:17:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rahul@juniper.net)
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:17:26 -0700
From: Rahul Aggarwal <rahul@juniper.net>
To: barryleiba@computer.org
In-Reply-To: <6c9fcc2a0910211232p2b78f256w31bd5d5920d47502@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20091021181718.O40803@sapphire.juniper.net>
References: <6c9fcc2a0910211232p2b78f256w31bd5d5920d47502@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2009 01:17:27.0258 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B150BA0:01CA52B5]
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr@tools.ietf.org, ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr-06
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:19:36 -0000
Hi Barry, Thanks for the review! rahul On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Barry Leiba wrote: > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the > security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat > these comments just like any other last call comments. > > I see no problem with this document. It points to the base Traffic > Engineering extensions for security considerations, and that seems > correct. > > I'll add a note that I appreciated having abbreviations spelled out in > the introduction. Thanks. > > Barry >
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-node… Barry Leiba
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-… Rahul Aggarwal