Re: [secdir] [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 02 October 2018 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACC5130DF6; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 05:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YSCG_jKCMB6v; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 05:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4472127598; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 05:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3584; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1538483310; x=1539692910; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=8Gv5Czrt/DhmoP2K9wKZdxr2S8OWXww42a/nZJ44jME=; b=h8hWIMhtw0RJM8fx7uJyooOd5UBprNR/DADq5PSY6tdbgFSJwCoSxvTk bXvJa6VSHD3lOColFPAINlaIkgOtUbGU2LsGM35AeW0D7DZWQNypFYvC1 Z4Kg8cygcOaqmTw3aU48y3Hvbku1Ap8CUuNqFaT3qsugtKNfuy1BcmLd9 Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AiAAD4Y7Nb/xbLJq1aGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBVINeEoQciHSNSZZwgWYIA4F3gnUChC43FQEDAQECAQECbSiFOQEFI1YQCxgqAgJXBg0IAQEVAoMGAYIBpTqBLooND4JtiC2CAIE5gW1QLoRngxiCVwKIZJRYCYQBgWiKSQYXiQ2GTZVAgVgigVUzGggbFYMogiQXEY4JPY8AAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.54,331,1534809600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="6884293"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Oct 2018 12:28:27 +0000
Received: from [10.61.94.24] (ams3-vpn-dhcp7705.cisco.com [10.61.94.24]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w92CSRgv003734; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 12:28:27 GMT
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra.all@ietf.org, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, anima@ietf.org, Security Directorate <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <153826253306.18743.9250084704876465818@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2sh1qkebi.wl-randy@psg.com> <057bd957-06b4-824e-a7c8-214383819621@huitema.net> <m2murxi8ws.wl-randy@psg.com> <b4a32733-c2df-6bea-17d2-4d45ee4d5136@cisco.com> <m2wor0h9vu.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=lear@cisco.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNJUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAb2Zjb3Vyc2VpbXJpZ2h0LmNvbT7CwJEEEwECADsCGwMC HgECF4ACGQEWIQSY0L2QRh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgID AQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6MyMyCACXvtFjAYGMtOkD9MD4nI3ifFpkrj8xTMbXjrv5hdqmzRmQ0wqA 1U/OlZux+P/NaVMiZNZc8zw0nsx/INAqDOVd4/tLWF+ywTkeRFR0VnaUxLwCReZAZOaRS+md +52u/6ddoFja2RnjZ43qbbuvVUARQVIyMJz+GbR6mEZQHR0psD7dDYZDyrpivCxm8zHQwmB6 AZUlO7OJgljDvVPVDCabg/ZnJw1qS0OzSiNb0MySk1D5A7FdwDgeKxuMYUOOoVVTTMWNWcME UkRX9LxElswEt0PQWiz/j3FYXTxiFfl/1vKcHx4pM+E5C5mhTbrdFUFLJC3Y5fLID7stK/Ch aEaBzsBNBFMe1UQBCAC0WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Ma cj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGoHOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U 7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExddqV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcY Y/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5cHUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU +tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypucGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5 ABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c6 2pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHSiXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnX HXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGwf2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycj PAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoAMjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPF OmDhJSmH55HLAky2MlmqJYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt 2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNRzGbgqoT1Di03RQ==
Message-ID: <1fd9c9d5-508f-901e-818c-3cc87725c331@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:28:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2wor0h9vu.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="981ih7QmMURQLEwL07H96ixPyUQlTuSjH"
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.94.24, ams3-vpn-dhcp7705.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/s5DMlsmzdJxPQzfwkKm4k5xA3AE>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 12:28:32 -0000

Randy

On 02.10.18 13:21, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> when i sell the lightb^Hrouter to mary, of course i reset to factory
>>> settings.
>> Great.  Mary can register the device with light^hrouter manufacturer
>> and life goes on.
> iff the manufacturer still exists and the manufacture is willing.
>
> you and others seem to be missing that there is a major right of
> ownership war going on out here in the real world.
>
>

I think we've lost sight of what we're talking about.  We're talking
about a completely automated method for a local trust anchor to be
installed on a device, and a kick to EST for the device to receive a
local credential.  For that to happen there needs to be a trusted
introduction, and the device manufacturer or its agent is in the best
position to do that.

There are many ways for a manufacturer to lock a device to a deployment
without this, just one example being a software license that gets erased
on device reset (remember?  you said you were going to perform a device
reset).  I'd suggest that we not get wrapped around the axle over the
ownership war. 

I would be more concerned about what happens if the manufacturer goes
out of business.  I think that's a bigger deal, but can I ask that we
also consider that problem with some more experience under our belts?  I
could easily envision a few solutions, but better would be to face down
the problem with some more code and deployment.  BTW, manufacturer going
out of business also means no more {bug fixes, security patches, h/w
support, etc}, and so zooming in and just dealing with this may be
suboptimal.

Eliot