Re: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-dane-ops-12

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Fri, 10 July 2015 05:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A98D1A88B9; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 22:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lx57UFt_F7UA; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 22:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 332A91A889D; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 22:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 3AB38284D69; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 05:05:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 05:05:08 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20150710050507.GQ28047@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A818C43CD4@szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A818C43CD4@szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/sRsDelQRNa8bdEXk3lEHh0k3HJU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:22:27 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-dane-ops.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dane-ops.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF Security Directorate <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-dane-ops-12
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 05:05:10 -0000

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:42:06AM +0000, Tina TSOU wrote:

> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments that arrive in timely manner, and not
> significantly belated.

Note that -13 has been published in the mean time and addresses at least
one of the concerns:

If it reasonable to ask you to glance over the diff from -12 to
-13 to see whether that introduces new issues or resolves any of
the ones you listed?

> * Section 9, page 21:
> > This order SHOULD be configurable by the MTA
> >    administrator. 
> 
> Please expand "MTA". Also, why make the explanation mail-specific?

This text was modified in -13 to not mention MTAs.

-- 
	Viktor.