Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-05

Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net> Wed, 14 October 2015 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <shraddha@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B7D1B2CE4; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.008
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_84=0.6, MANGLED_MEDS=2.3, MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT=2.399, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JxTSJkXVBL9y; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0744.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:744]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F3C1B2CF9; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.107.139) by BY1PR0501MB1383.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.107.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.293.16; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:25:53 +0000
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.107.139]) by BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.107.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0293.007; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:25:53 +0000
From: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
To: "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
Thread-Topic: secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-05
Thread-Index: AQHRAtRkmhe1qX1HzE+v6FQBX6gc055pfMIAgADOMgCAAFTSgIAAHung
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:25:52 +0000
Message-ID: <BY1PR0501MB1381F6F77C13B89DF71CCE33D53F0@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1510091159450.26829@multics.mit.edu> <27748_1444745556_561D1154_27748_5857_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F677EDF@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1510132230020.26829@multics.mit.edu> <15267_1444808052_561E0574_15267_17748_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F678F48@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <15267_1444808052_561E0574_15267_17748_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F678F48@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=shraddha@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.10]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY1PR0501MB1383; 5:2ThhaQD/T8FaaiSUhtlkbUIscb6CqxOILMzhSbW7Av4WKcIB5Oneag8trmKMJ+EcfHqrKgIuXEx/hmSM/1qw5tK+n1wzjEttjKAstSgpLin/MECRtJempM6etV+iBTDXaLBJ/HzoDTJBd1HDKSJMLw==; 24:oBYNSXqsFimOmFXZhXcDp5y4d89ScBf8BftF4GvjrmUb7BGYMdcBimv2XpN7+O8VFRkXEtKr0cgQpwOGwgwG0h7nm7HMIiTNYZ6U9sEzdFo=; 20:QeJOjno26qoN/inU272VuhG//pnjA7K1WVQIGDKhPl9kxYPQ0hWKPrbwaOutfK4ZUj13cjKMdPeKpqiFKGXSvQ==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1383;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY1PR0501MB13834B34B26BCC1D0D56680CD53F0@BY1PR0501MB1383.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008)(240460790083961);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(520078)(3002001); SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1383; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1383;
x-forefront-prvs: 0729050452
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(13464003)(377454003)(24454002)(51914003)(110136002)(5003600100002)(2501003)(5007970100001)(86362001)(77096005)(5002640100001)(19580405001)(11100500001)(2950100001)(66066001)(50986999)(64706001)(92566002)(46102003)(76576001)(2900100001)(99936001)(5004730100002)(40100003)(76176999)(81156007)(2171001)(5001960100002)(106356001)(10400500002)(5890100001)(97736004)(5001770100001)(122556002)(99286002)(93886004)(106116001)(5001920100001)(74316001)(101416001)(230783001)(33656002)(102836002)(19580395003)(189998001)(5008740100001)(54356999)(87936001)(105586002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1383; H:BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_BY1PR0501MB1381F6F77C13B89DF71CCE33D53F0BY1PR0501MB1381_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Oct 2015 09:25:53.0041 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0501MB1383
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/sqMAenDRuf7bMFuLVtVgVD8HNes>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:18:02 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.all@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:26:22 -0000

Thanks Bruno.
Attaching the latest diff.

Rgds
Shraddha

-----Original Message-----
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decraene@orange.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 1:04 PM
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>; Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
Cc: iesg@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.all@ietf.org
Subject: RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-05

Ben, Shraddha,

> From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:kaduk@MIT.EDU] > Sent: Wednesday, October 
> 14, 2015 4:31 AM
> 
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> >
> >
> > > In section 4.5, I do not see that the constraint "Traffic from A 
> > > nodes to
> >
> > > I nodes must not go through R and T nodes" can be satisfied for 
> > > the
> >
> > > leftmost pair of A nodes.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the careful review.
> >
> > My mistake. I missed the left part of the network.
> >
> > I see 2 options:
> >
> > a) add some network topology on the left part
> >
> > b) remove the leftmost pair of A nodes.
> 
> Option 'a' sounds good to me.

ok.

Shraddha, please find enclosed the updated "artwork".
My xml file is out of sync. You should only copy the figure   <figure anchor="Explicit_routing_topology" title="Explicit Routing topology">
 
-- Bruno

> -Ben

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.