[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09

Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Sun, 10 February 2019 21:38 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: rmcat@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154983471836.14687.15606048759231374187@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 13:38:38 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/swYZFU0EZoXupCMAJcrXoT5Npp4>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09

Reviewer: Joseph Salowey
Review result: Has Issues

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Document has issues.   I would like to see Stewart
Bryant's Genart comments about emphasizing that tests should be conducted in a
controlled environment and not the open Internet.

[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rm… Joseph Salowey
Re: [secdir] [rmcat] Secdir last call review of d… Colin Perkins