IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] AD's acknowledging reviews

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 08 May 2020 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4823A0EE7 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RqGsYPhlYMj for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD6463A0EE8 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 048KswKD001487; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:54:58 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu 048KswKD001487
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1588971298; bh=nfadeI0Fe5f7hIRRUrVBqJssXc1x/u04DbLhy5o4mtM=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ol5vzdK9ap5iuJq224Gl//puX8NhErFB8vpASjuFAQTV8PZYtMRELiAWZhpzM+Lao xEozC5xe1qQYL9t6v5iJRj+hjiDNGLYd22oeXqE3YrZ6XG3kC3OhYHIjeCgAaGiise y3M2iGasp5SOsvvSlrDT0Fkqev05T2Ps14q/+cMI=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 048KsrSY025645; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:54:53 -0400
Received: from MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.47) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (10.64.28.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:54:53 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1847.3; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:54:52 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%22]) with mapi id 15.01.1847.007; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:54:52 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD's acknowledging reviews
Thread-Index: AQHWJXicVP7xbz9oNUC5WxAsTkdbEKiep9tg
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 20:54:52 +0000
Message-ID: <540d995e78114929a3e3fac6902f6fd9@cert.org>
References: <F9C3BBE9-D04A-482E-966F-050C2F0A6A97@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <F9C3BBE9-D04A-482E-966F-050C2F0A6A97@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.202.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_540d995e78114929a3e3fac6902f6fd9certorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/t-CkeVidqxbVjYAsGE_3zzdXFWU>
Subject: Re: [secdir] AD's acknowledging reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 20:55:12 -0000

Hi Rich!

Ben and I definitely appreciate the reviews.  I’ve been (inconsistently) putting acknowledgements into my ballot text but Alissa’s approach is the better model.  I will update my telechat review workflow by sending an acknowledgement + ballot summary via a top-post to the secdir review thread.

Again, the reviews are REALLY appreciated!

Roman

From: secdir <secdir-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 4:38 PM
To: secdir@ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] AD's acknowledging reviews

I have asked about this twice before, and have never received an AD response. Perhaps third time’s the charm.

After a secdir review is done, and after any comment threads have died down, it would be polite for the responsible AD to acknowledge the review and indicate what they are planning on doing. Alissa does this for gen-art directorate reviews, see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/AKp-b-S4B_ITv8EKg_UgD1wBh3k/ for an example.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email