Re: [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt

[joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

On 8/29/15 3:10 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> If the IESG would like to set a clear, unambiguous policy about this,
> I'm sure it would be welcomed; personally, I've heard advice both
> ways, and have not yet figured out how to make everyone happy.

Well... you can ask me. imho the situation looks like the following to me.

I think it's fine to have the discussion, propose the updates and hold
the draft update till the end; or to roll a new version as the product
of the discussion. The former runs the risk of accumulating a discuss
either from me or from another AD due to something that "really needs to
be addressed" prior to exit from iesg review. the later that we need
more time, if it comes shortly before thursday. ( the call is now at
0700 pacific) so it's extremely unlikely that I will manange to
re-review something submitted late wednesday evening.

I'm kind of waiting on the update to the iana language I asked for on
8/15 and that is a barrier to publication, but I expect we know what
it's going to say in that respect already so I'm not going to hold up
the dicussion on that...

thanks
joel

> Cheers,
> 
> -- Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 
>