Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-13

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 29 March 2018 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F068B12DA0A for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 04:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gWWOoPeGFqoo for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 04:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu [18.9.25.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6631712DA07 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 04:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190c-647ff700000035ce-e7-5abcd3a9f0dc
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 7F.62.13774.9A3DCBA5; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 07:53:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id w2TBrC8U021979; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 07:53:12 -0400
Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w2TBr8de006853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 07:53:11 -0400
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:53:08 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: David Mandelberg <david+work@mandelberg.org>
Cc: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180329115308.GE77617@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <56ce2942-388f-d03b-721a-3b06af5559bc@mandelberg.org> <ef5efa3a9f1d434580946f1012ebb0bc@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <9521bc0e-a1f2-046e-8e92-9e4a64237036@mandelberg.org> <d259d31119534e76b1ebf45faab43941@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <894918aa-b853-299c-38f4-6c56ce385c64@mandelberg.org> <20180326153348.GE44086@kduck.kaduk.org> <d0274470-5737-57f4-1d16-0631f386403c@mandelberg.org> <23228.2906.789875.266549@fireball.acr.fi> <20180329004632.GM76724@kduck.kaduk.org> <6df7eedf-530f-91c4-05bf-8b514ec661c1@mandelberg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6df7eedf-530f-91c4-05bf-8b514ec661c1@mandelberg.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA01SS0wTQRjO7G7LtHbNsjw6vExcxCCkBQyHJhAjHJRITEjk1AuudG1X2oXs tkAJByIXBWIKcpAmijwMgsQop6IgWjACIRpAoJ6IiVEBDW1CjYigu2143L5/vtfM5Ic4fVOV DHnByYkCa2fUWoLWJGQbBhfHzLlTU6mm9vCEyvT2wze1KdjzmTiPl/T3b2Mlk+EeoiTUvkaU 4WZtoYWz87WcmHPuqtbW+25IXdOlqZ8fHcaagCemBWggovJR6N+OugVoIU31YejuziciOjwH aOXeMhYdljD0YHQaUywElYEmH/kidjV1CjW1LuIKjqdyUSC8FjnHqQtotXNWreA4qhT19dwC CiblutWgB0RDvQTaez6IR4lYNNP1hYias1Bgb00ugzJOQQN7UDnWUMXoyXZ35A4JVDoav+OP 8QDKe8TtPeL2HrofAnwIpFkcDQYHy9slrtIgVbKCwImGPKODdxo5i2sERL43SecDcz8u+QEF AaMjTb0vzbSKrZXcDj9IghiTQFrej5np49eqLW4bK9kqRJedk/wAQZyJJzczZTlpYd0NnFi9 T6VAgtGTF/OzzTRlZZ1cFcfVcOI+mwohg8iRBTk0VuSsXP113u48pDGoUcJ1cniioiGlGtYh 8dYoPwsMcHqzsw2nCaFa4JL15CtFRCkim0s4yFFWB1VNNK4DvfysOLJCUenkxTpIWpdLMLkk vjFS4mQPqeQmsLxSl3i/vrCjc/Pp65E3lOfP6b7S38GOs5d3B+rIuTMnivj1sm6q2CiyMd6/ bsfGgK/g50JoY2vYZ73ylSkKNPPl0g1aXx4IFnb8QqqC9NumqeX+gNDsPNm76ra+MGIoJ3zs 2WTf7tJ8RlpoPH3wY0Zm6/ct1wxsg+7HLQwh2di8LFyU2P+w0x8iFQMAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/tRw1vD5rwmswyKNxIQqmaK9Smjs>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 11:53:16 -0000

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:26:57AM -0400, David Mandelberg wrote:
> On 03/28/2018 08:46 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > Hi Tero,
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:38:34AM +0300, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> >>
> >> "Correct review" is meant to be used when you want to correct some
> >> mistke in your review. For example link points to wrong location or
> >> version does not match.
> >>
> >> You can also use it to fix the "review summary" if it is incorrect for
> >> some reason, but it is not really meant to be used to mark whether the
> >> discussion triggered by the review caused the issues to be fixed.
> >> I.e., if the issues found in review are fixed, you do not edit the
> >> review, but simply reply to the review thread in mailing lists saying
> >> that "Yes, this solves my issues" or similar, so when ADs check the
> >> thread they will see that as final email in the thread and know that
> >> issues have been solved.
> > 
> > Thanks for the clarification!
> 
> Ditto. Should I change the link and status back to what they were before?

I wouldn't bother -- we can just go forward with the results we've
learned from the experiment.

-Ben