Re: [secdir] [Gen-art] Gen-ART / SecDir Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 15 June 2016 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C2012D660; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R4WPE-epJjrg; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42D512D0A9; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D1F2CED2; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:02:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W2nJU5pUzW-a; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:02:58 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFB12CC9C; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:02:58 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3446620F-3878-4A9D-935F-66C975AAD180"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <A6A462B3-6AEC-4F62-BEFE-FCC89F7FCB9C@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:02:59 +0300
Message-Id: <01F18301-E22E-4ED3-AB01-DC807510A2CE@piuha.net>
References: <850F2C19-92CD-48AC-B88B-6C89E136786C@cisco.com> <A6A462B3-6AEC-4F62-BEFE-FCC89F7FCB9C@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/uKa5-FfNrt1IIHHMDOHQzS4Vgxw>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification.all@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Gen-art] Gen-ART / SecDir Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:03:02 -0000

Thanks Mat & Ben.

Jari

On 02 Jun 2016, at 17:56, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 2 Jun 2016, at 10:23, Matt Miller (mamille2) wrote:
> 
>> I am the coincidentally-assigned Gen-ART and SecDir reviewer
>> for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF
>> documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  The Security
>> Directorate reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
>> the security area directors.  Please treat these comments just like any
>> other last call comments that arrived on time.
>> 
>> For more information on Gen-Art, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq >.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07
>> Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller
>> Review Date: 2016-06-02
>> IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-01
>> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>> 
>> Summary:
>> 
>> This document is ready to be published as a Proposed Standard
>> once the nit is taken care of.
>> 
>> I reviewed a previous revision of this document (-04), and all of my
>> concerns from the earlier review are addressed herein.
>> 
>> I note this document includes normative references to two Informational
>> documents (RFCs 7201 and 7667).  The references are important to
>> properly understand some of the security considerations of this
>> document, but it appears the responsible AD is to add them to the
>> approved downrefs registry.
> 
> Just an observation: we did do a second IETF last call for to the normative downrefs.
> 
> [...]
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art