IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] AD's acknowledging reviews

Derrell Piper <ddp@electric-loft.org> Fri, 08 May 2020 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ddp@electric-loft.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E992A3A0F48 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYLBn5sq-sqz for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mail.Yoyodyne.COM (mail.yoyodyne.com [IPv6:2604:4ec0:0:2::d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DDB93A0E2C for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2603:3024:1767:6000:84fc:5990:cbd4:b803] ([2603:3024:1767:6000:84fc:5990:cbd4:b803]) by Mail.Yoyodyne.COM via Internet for <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> (and others); Fri, 8 May 2020 16:01:37 PDT
From: Derrell Piper <ddp@electric-loft.org>
Message-Id: <87BD6B82-8CDD-4392-B928-C3A9AFD36B87@electric-loft.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8235A314-EC39-478D-9B3C-5316A3C53FEB"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 16:01:35 -0700
In-Reply-To: <F9C3BBE9-D04A-482E-966F-050C2F0A6A97@akamai.com>
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <F9C3BBE9-D04A-482E-966F-050C2F0A6A97@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ujgEovo5Nptx3EDhsoe4Rn1zh7c>
Subject: Re: [secdir] AD's acknowledging reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 23:01:41 -0000


> On May 8, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I have asked about this twice before, and have never received an AD response. Perhaps third time’s the charm.
>  
> After a secdir review is done, and after any comment threads have died down, it would be polite for the responsible AD to acknowledge the review and indicate what they are planning on doing. Alissa does this for gen-art directorate reviews, see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/AKp-b-S4B_ITv8EKg_UgD1wBh3k/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/AKp-b-S4B_ITv8EKg_UgD1wBh3k/> for an example.

For threads that have a lot of comments, I wouldn’t want to see the AD have to ack all reviews.

Derrell

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email