Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-13

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 28 March 2018 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54C21275AB for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJnAHzJ52Zfp for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu [18.7.68.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00DC0126DC2 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074423-60fff70000005664-61-5abbeb3df1cd
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id FA.92.22116.E3BEBBA5; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:21:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id w2SJLWuZ001369; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:21:33 -0400
Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w2SJLTBl024802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:21:31 -0400
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:21:29 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: David Mandelberg <david+work@mandelberg.org>
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180328192129.GG76724@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <3b7c6cdc-0e9e-0a57-e030-ae3a715c6a03@mandelberg.org> <e32e5f9bc00043e3a8b86205d434c35d@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <56ce2942-388f-d03b-721a-3b06af5559bc@mandelberg.org> <ef5efa3a9f1d434580946f1012ebb0bc@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <9521bc0e-a1f2-046e-8e92-9e4a64237036@mandelberg.org> <d259d31119534e76b1ebf45faab43941@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <894918aa-b853-299c-38f4-6c56ce385c64@mandelberg.org> <20180326153348.GE44086@kduck.kaduk.org> <d0274470-5737-57f4-1d16-0631f386403c@mandelberg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d0274470-5737-57f4-1d16-0631f386403c@mandelberg.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrNIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrWv/eneUwaJeAYuJX/ezWnxY+JDF gcljyZKfTB4fJ75kCWCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mr48nklW8FXrorZG2IaGM9ydDFyckgImEj8 PrSHrYuRi0NIYDGTxL9NB5lAEkICGxklPrVbQySuMkk8fXyeFSTBIqAq0fPxKiOIzSagItHQ fZkZxBYRMJC48fUlO4jNLKAu8eb+ajYQW1jAW2Lxwg6wel6gbfdfd7BDLPjLLHFkURpEXFDi 5MwnLBC9WhI3/r0EOoIDyJaWWP4P7FBOASeJvf1dYLeJCihL7O07xD6BUWAWku5ZSLpnIXQv YGRexSibklulm5uYmVOcmqxbnJyYl5dapGuml5tZopeaUrqJERSi7C7KOxhf9nkfYhTgYFTi 4bVYtDtKiDWxrLgy9xCjJAeTkijv0xlAIb6k/JTKjMTijPii0pzU4kOMEhzMSiK87zWAcrwp iZVVqUX5MClpDhYlcV4PE+0oIYH0xJLU7NTUgtQimKwMB4eSBC/rK6BGwaLU9NSKtMycEoQ0 EwcnyHAeoOGmIDW8xQWJucWZ6RD5U4zGHCfeT+lh5piyZFoPsxBLXn5eqpQ4LwtIqQBIaUZp Htw0UJqRyN5f84pRHOg5Yd5qkCoeYIqCm/cKaBUT0KptTTtAVpUkIqSkGhj5Fu21nB+Xm5Mu GGOQ90as8jl3YYJbj4SEn//HoDsCDsamnLPuex3csInLt2xq3hV2X/FXM95eDlH9EMLAdV5t 1/nmPiN+4wNsEYZ+Bu6Sb+d/u1dzoi14fs72GaFFE2XKU8MyhB+J+DZ7mRjc0F7kdyJk+WTf zZfui7lVdAqYtDJe81h8X4mlOCPRUIu5qDgRADWUXEsOAwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ujuuBMbXT13CKUqoU-FSn-NiRNs>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 19:21:39 -0000

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:09:46PM -0400, David Mandelberg wrote:
> On 03/26/2018 11:33 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 07:18:15PM -0400, David Mandelberg wrote:
> >> No worries about the delay. And I'm just a secdir reviewer, not an IESG
> >> member, so I can't do anything about a DISCUSS.
> > 
> > FWIW, you should be able to edit the secdir review's summary
> > evaulation by going into the dattracker (while logged in), finding
> > the "my reviews" item from either the sidebar or the <username>
> > dropdown in the top, selecting the given review request from the
> > list, and using the "correct review" button.  I don't know that we
> > have a huge amount of experience with doing this, whether you can
> > change the reviewed revision as well, etc., so don't feel like you
> > have to do this.  (But if you do, please report back to the secdir
> > list how it went!)
> 
> I edited it, so the state is now Ready. One thing that surprised me 
> though, is that adding a new review version changed the review link 
> ("posted at") and status for the old review version.

Perhaps that's a function of editing the existing review request
instead of creating a new review object for the new version.  Maybe
Tero understands this better than I do and wants to say something
about the expected/desired workflow...

Thanks for circling back,

Ben