[secdir] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3-13

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Wed, 09 December 2015 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6852F1B2B09 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:03:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bg_-OhbzW7HB for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E82D1B2B48 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igvg19 with SMTP id g19so124380862igv.1 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 06:03:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=/oHiCIKtjwKP/Yd5tEkQ4ueOHkG0uIa4f25M0Iuq0So=; b=HlpqF4ec/a4l4QFDysrBwNHp31vk7rmJbASr/rtUGfmPZjkbCO0Ts9N41+b5Iv/OW3 5cvvsP8anKdxIm/nGNmhIckPAugcKS9KIeYVSB4qmfk5REYKdw8VkceKt35fWmqzGQ5c Tfo39eMti5VB3alWb1QZvg41Duj1qVhnrjdlWazFCD5WBMYPgO7JDGyf9nfO2jIpMGCg Vzb0ms9mbnrRomRn89/L7yx7Nj560T6Bzl+sU4zyLnIBHOKexByhg3P8AAdC2HFp1vHp vi3Ggi/unMS6qHtk3X3tUV2QpGZNxTpv6JafKcu29ARV91y08hEkpgBGDCB+uLXZSxCB HWJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=/oHiCIKtjwKP/Yd5tEkQ4ueOHkG0uIa4f25M0Iuq0So=; b=Zs4n3pkcxdCAD/aLzOWJJj8e9mM5NSCANBUixe5GeZBpy6x1VY4/Kyygkym4EdZzVN AX8WlzJtUIEEAbBRc2SOWwUhyPxg299Mp2S8N8DhLODebDm9sK26xVj/3E3xgC8oTkhO 0wrekynWTxfQigRWBFqnXpZL3O68sRvN3vM4/kPepuVFdehCPumwefxfkpcQ1O8MLBSp Uutss8HlKcL4cvNQZqrqrxBe0afNk2n5L2xJs0egNDI+3HPBEit1BwoAK9Tq5lhsaCvH bCG7z21GuGblFgcd5u4FLH5Lgx+GzBBteFJpZnsKTrWo1KKxF1cjQdVYavRZzAVNbL79 i6WA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkQo7OncxCJLxmoCiGS3t42Z3GpUgRwyqSgwzp+5EaXGb6pFPlNjKxDVq932DvmB07gnw7TF4ZEKWeb23Fgd/cm7EGDdf1U6Qz5+F/bAT3k4B+h70=
X-Received: by 10.50.157.34 with SMTP id wj2mr28940633igb.32.1449669802834; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 06:03:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:03:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SS-VoJnauz-T-P4w420VNqo6qt6vCfwb9JfsN7ZpZqnmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136b620a41f8a0526778dff
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/v0dqTMZA19-svNIAcuXuQcYeglw>
Subject: [secdir] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:03:26 -0000

This is _NOT_ a proper review, and hence only to secdir.

I've take a good look at this thing, and its a rather complicated addition
to an already rather complicated protocol.

I don't feel qualified to make a good assessment of it, I suggest you find
someone more expert on the protocols to review.

Happy to take an alternate assignment!